English

Your language: ▼

Every day we offer FREE licensed software you’d have to buy otherwise.

$49.95

EXPIRED

Giveaway of the day — Fast HTML Checker 3.0

A tool used for searching sites for HTML5 and CSS errors.

$49.95 EXPIRED

User rating: 42 15 comments

Fast HTML Checker 3.0 was available as a giveaway on May 6, 2017!

Download trialFast HTML Checker 3.0

Today Giveaway of the Day

$34.95

free today

WonderFox Video Watermark 3.3

Fast watermarking speed and 0 quality loss!

Proceed to download page

A tool used for searching sites for HTML5 and CSS errors. It begins checking from the starting page and goes through all pages one by one until it checks all pages on the site. If Fast HTML Checker finds an error, it shows its position in the document and the error reason. Fast HTML Checker includes a feature-rich web site crawler, which supports different user authentication types such as SSL certificate and form login.

System Requirements:

Windows XP and higher (32&64-bit)

Publisher:

WebTweakTools

Homepage:

https://webtweaktools.com/fasthtmlchecker

File Size:

24.4 MB

Price:

$49.95

How would you improve Fast HTML Checker 3.0?

All ideas (0) Top five ideas Searches Leave feedback

No similar feedback found. Feel free to add yours!

Leave feedback Go to the project page ›

GIVEAWAY download basket

Dev-C++

Developed by Orwell

TortoiseSVN

Developed by The TortoiseSVN team

UltraEdit

Developed by IDM Computer Solutions, Inc.

DJ Java Decompiler

Developed by Atanas Neshkov

Comments on Fast HTML Checker 3.0

Thank you for voting!
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.

Thanks for the help. I did get it to save the generated report by manually creating a file first. Seems like an opportunity for improvement, either give notice the file does not exist, or even better yet offer to create it. Was able to see in that report a description or the errors. I'll work with the program more and see how well it does on errors.

Reply | Comment by BobbyA – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)

Program info says: "A tool used for searching sites for HTML5 and CSS errors". But. in the Site Options it only says that HTTP 1.1 is the version used.

Reply | Comment by RLT – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)

BobbyA, to save report, you have to create the file first. Then use that file name for the report.

Reply | Comment by RLT – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-1)

I did not get a registered copy; it is only good for 30 days...

Reply | Comment by RLT – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-3)

RLT, Have you followed the steps in Readme to register the copy?

Reply | Comment by Alexa Bennett – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Alexa Bennett, yes I did read the info that came with the program.

It ask you to: Enter the key into the field 'Your activation code'--> Press 'Online Activation'

When you do this, it does NOT register the program.

Reply | Comment by RLT – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Why would I ever want to check the HTML of a website I am visiting?

Reply | Comment by dan – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-10)

dan, my thoughts EXACTLY!

Reply | Comment by Joe Bob – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

TK,

"Curiosity" is always valid - thanks for your reply.
Dan

Reply | Comment by bromberg – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Typically, who needs and uses this s/w?

Reply | Comment by webeye – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-13)

webeye, People who develop websites might find it useful. Just because something is of no interest to you doesn't mean it's of no interest to other people.

Reply | Comment by Martin harran – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Found I can view report just not save it yet. All files received code 200 OK, Says in various red, black & green text there are 6 warnings and 100+ markup errors, but offers no insight into the nature or which lines are of concern. Not very helpful or promising so far.

Reply | Comment by BobbyA – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+6)

Installed quickly on i7 win 8 laptop. Ran registration twice because it was hard to tell if registered after advised program restart. Ran scan with default choices. However trying to generate report fails. Left the defaults, HAD to choose a file name to save report. Message then comes up: Failed to Generate the Report. Clicking OK results in this message: can't open file 'mine.txt' (error 5: access is denied). Tried a couple different names. Parking program pending developer response, will uninstall tomorrow if none. Thanks GAOTD.

Reply | Comment by BobbyA – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+4)

BobbyA, to save report, you have to create the file first. Then use that file name for the report.

Reply | Comment by RLT – 7 years ago – Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Well, it downloads OK, and despite taking an age to install, it does get there in the end.

In operation, it crawls the site fairly quickly, and the HTML* validation is fairly good. It is more picky than the W3C checker, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

However, the CSS validation is a bit rubbish. It complains "The construction is followed by an unexpected character." whenever it finds a /* css comment */ and it puts out "A '}' character expected." errors for no apparent reason. I can't see why, and nor can the W3C CSS validator.

Its usability is poor. To generate a report after checking a site requires no less than seven mouse clicks.

Overall, it is almost worth having for free. But it needs the CSS validation bugs fixed or it will send users on wildgoose chases.

*I only tested with HTML5