Every day we offer FREE licensed software you’d have to buy otherwise.

Photo Stamp Remover 8.1 Giveaway
$49.99
EXPIRED

Giveaway of the day — Photo Stamp Remover 8.1

Remove watermarks, date stamps and other unwanted objects on photos.
$49.99 EXPIRED
User rating: 156 (78%) 43 (22%) 54 comments

Photo Stamp Remover 8.1 was available as a giveaway on April 27, 2016!

Today Giveaway of the Day
$14.99
free today
Update your registry and optimize the performance of your PC!

Photo Stamp Remover is a photo correction utility that can remove watermarks, date stamps and other unwanted objects that appear on photographs. Offering a fully automatic process, the program uses an intelligent restoration technology to fill the selected area with the texture generated from the pixels around the selection, so that the defect blends into the rest of the image naturally.

What takes hours to correct using the clone tool, can be accomplished in a minute using Photo Stamp Remover.

Purchase an Unlimited personal license (with support and updates) at 50% discount!

System Requirements:

Windows 7/ 8/ 10

Publisher:

SoftOrbits

Homepage:

http://www.softorbits.com/photo-stamp-remover/

File Size:

13.9 MB

Price:

$49.99

GIVEAWAY download basket

Developed by CyberLink Corp.
Developed by PhotoInstrument
Create, manage, copy and edit custom images.
Developed by Mirillis Ltd.

Comments on Photo Stamp Remover 8.1

Thank you for voting!
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.
#24

First I must tell you that I tried it out the program to the depth before posting any comment.

What looks so good at a first time when you import your series of pictures (in my case with a timestamp in it) turns out to be horrific frustrating the longer you try to work with it.

1. program is unstable !!! it crashed several times on my Windows 8.1. In mid of calculation. A NO GO !
2. removal algorithms did not work as I want them to work, even on very similar pictures it produces different interpolations.
3. the calculating takes a very long time, even on small pictures (720x480) and even if the marked area is very very small.
4. when changing picture in batch-mode you lose the masking!!!


Sum up the disadvantages:
UNSTABLE; SLOW, FULL OF ERRORS
Not worth the time I wasted with it.

Adding the fact that every new giveaway from Softorbits makes previous Softorbit giveaways unusable (reverts them back into demo-mode) I would say, keep your hands off this program in this stage of developement. It has more from a beta version than from commercial program. We are speaking of a paid program....

BatchInpaint from GOTD, though not the best content removal too, finally did the job for me more satisfying and stable.

Reply   |   Comment by Jan Serpentine  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#23

I just wanted to say thank you for this program. I had Inpaint on my XP computer and lost it when I had to get a new computer and I have been waiting for another similar program to remove unwanted objects. Thank you so much.

Reply   |   Comment by Velvet  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#22

Just tested it on a photo then did the same with Inpaint and have to say both did the job
The Inpaint version did look better so when this version of Photo stamp remover has it's activation revert I will just uninstall and not really miss it.
Tried Movavi Photo Editor as someone posted and it took more effort and was not free but using snipping tool I could save the image without any watermark

Reply   |   Comment by ilikefree  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#21

I had this last time it was given away and found it reverted to less than a trial version next time I tried to use it.
Uninstalled using Revo Uninstaller.
I will try it again though.

Reply   |   Comment by ilikefree  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+6)

ilikefree (& everyone else),
I'd say the only way you (or anyone else for that matter) can *keep* the program registered is to block the program from connecting to the Internet via a firewall program. I personally use ZoneAlarm myself but there are free firewalls out there that can accomplish the same end result...

Reply   |   Comment by Trying 2 b Helpful  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+5)
#20

I just did a quick one, and I was startled that it cleaned up pretty well! Thanks SoftOrbits and GAOD!!! Re worries about removing watermarks and the person it "belongs to" . Its not always the case that the person owns it. I'm always running into art from old books (so no longer copyrights) and there is no way I'd ever find a copy of some book from the early 1900s etc,..(illustrations) they are just research for me, and treasured! I wouldn't clear up someones photos/drawings etc and use them!

Reply   |   Comment by Martina  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+7)
#19

There seems to be a lot of 'professional' photographers around here...somehow doubt a 'real...professional' wouldn't even consider $50.00 software of this type. This and others like it are for the odd image you grab off the internet and want to mess around with. I AM a professional Chef...wouldn't be caught dead using a ginsu knife over a real chef knife...but I might use one to cut a rope or tree branch with...and a pro wouldn't have all their stuff (watermarked or not) all over the internet...much like I wouldn't post my favorite recipes on line...then whine about all the people who stole them...

Reply   |   Comment by Mothman  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#18

This program is cool but it crashes Roughly 50% of the time when doing inpainting 2.0. Win 10 64bit

Reply   |   Comment by Beach  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#17

I think this is a great software to improve your photos, although you must be creative and flexible to get rid off your unwanted things from your photos. You must also have patience for that. But it does the job, and if you are not discouraged after three minutes of work you get a job well done.

Reply   |   Comment by I think  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+4)
#16

Hi, thought something wrong with my system - same issue as Homas below. Tried 3 times, unzipped, ran the .exe, said it's registered and activated, but no program installed. Searched - it's nowhere. Looked through 'Control Panel' "programs" - not listed. Win 10 system. ???

Reply   |   Comment by Les  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

This happens if your anti-virus program is set to high and is blocking the install. You can turn down the settings or temporarily shut it off as you install. Remember to turn it back on before using the Net! GAOTD scans and checks every install, because if they gave out a virus even once their business would be dead. Right clicking on your anti-virus may give you an option for a 10 minute shutdown so if you forget it will auto-restart. It take a little time to shutdown your anti-virus so if you try right away it may fail, so try again and in works. I have to do this with a lot of GAOTD offers.

Reply   |   Comment by DB  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)

DB, Thanks very much - that sorted out the install.. I should have thought of that- "senior moment"

Reply   |   Comment by Les Woods  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#15

Where is it located on my computer? I can't seem to locate it. I unzipped it, got my license key, etc. but can't locate the program! Thanks.

Reply   |   Comment by homas  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)

homas,

If you installed with default on win7/win10:

"C:\Program Files (x86)\Photo Stamp Remover\StampRemover.exe"

Reply   |   Comment by casper  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#14

Installed and tried to clean up the pic from the publisher's site:
http://download.softorbits.com/softorbits.com/photo-stamp-remover/samples/IMG_01%281%29.jpg
No way! Instead I give a try with InPaint and it was very easy.
Uninstalled.

Reply   |   Comment by Luis  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+16)

@ Luis: this software wouldn't achieve anything like the results claimed for it on the developer's website.

The shot of the buildings with figures 'cleaned' from the far right is especially hilarious: there are no contiguous blue pixels the software could've called upon to create the lower window sill in the same shade as the upper frame. As for the lady decorated every which way with logo over-printing: trust me, it's not a case of what takes hours to correct using the clone tool can be accomplished in a minute using Photo Stamp Remover more a case that using this software, it'd take you from here to Christmas and you'd still never manage it.

This is being marketed as a 'photo stamp remover' and it may, just, manage that with small (5pt) type on a constant background. A 'photo stamp' more complicated than that, and it'll fail totally. As an 'object remover', it ought to fare better.

That said though, time and again I've come across users of 'object removal' apps blaming what seems, to them, to be the software's failings when they themselves are at fault for not appreciating that unless you work at pixel level -- that is, with an image blown up to the absolute maximum and a 'brush' sized down to the absolute minimum then no. No software will work the way you hope it will.

As for any professional / commercial photographer worried about intellectual property theft, aw, c'mon: if you (or your studio or your Art Department) doesn't even know how to protect your work from image manipulation then you perhaps shouldn't be in the business at all.

Finally, a note of appreciation to SoftOrbits for the before-and-after pictures on its website. Brilliant, guys . . . though by my calendar, today is the 27th of April. Not the 1st.

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+21)

MikeR, how about some fact checking, and the REAL before-and-after on that "lady decorated every which way with logo over-printing":

http://ahp.li/d9b18ed90e3c8d6e9556.jpg

(My web host is perfectly safe, whatever sur-ly might say)

I did only her face and chest, because I didn't feel like going from April to Christmas, but I did it honestly and carefully. Radius size: 10.

That being said, Photo Stamp Remover can sometimes do the job, and its edge over InPaint is that it supports transparency, but such forgeries discredit SoftOrbits.

Reply   |   Comment by ouialaraison  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#13

What this software do is to take away the foreground and put the background there instead, that means that if you have a picture with, say a tree in the background, a face with a text and want to take away the text it will take away the text and put some parts of the tree (background) where the text was, and that will, in this case be where it is supposed to be a face. Put in other words, if the software should be able to do its work it need a very clean background, a very clean foreground and nothing else. Software downloaded, tested and deleted as useless.

Reply   |   Comment by par  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+15)

par,

"... to take away the text it will take away the text and put some parts of the tree (background) where the text was... Put in other words, if the software should be able to do its work it need a very clean background, a very clean foreground and nothing else."

It can be difficult to remove so-called watermarks -- that's the whole reason they're added to an image, to prevent you from re-using an image or video without acknowledging the source. And because you don't want to remove what's underneath the watermark, that rules out apps like the popular Inpaint. About all you can do is take data from surrounding pixels & paint over the watermark, in this case text.

That can be tedious, so apps like Photo Stamp Remover try to automate it, with varying degrees of success, depending on the app, the image, & the watermark. I'd expect Photo Stamp Remover would do better with something like the date stamp on a photo, since that's usually out of the way of the photo's main object or subject, & it's not designed to be hard to remove [where watermarks can be].

If removing watermarks or date stamps or whatever is something you do, or might do, it doesn't hurt in the least to keep something like Photo Stamp Remover handy -- it might work, and if it doesn't, you're certainly no worse off for trying. You *might* even keep a few similar apps, & try every one to see what does best on a particular image. If nothing works well enough you'll just have to do it manually in your preferred image editor -- there just is no magic bullet for image &/or video watermark or logo removal that will work 1st time, every time.

Reply   |   Comment by mike  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+13)

mike, it's also a crime. If I catch someone re-using my work without permission I will sue them, and possibly have them arrested.

Reply   |   Comment by Matthew  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-30)

Matthew,

Although copyright violation CAN be criminal, it is almost always treated as a civil offense since the standard for criminal conviction is extremely high. That being said, the civil penalties are sufficiently large that it should dissuade people from engaging in it. Please note, however, that removal of watermarks itself does not constitute a criminal action since there are legitimate reasons to do so as well. To give one example, once your copyright expires (admittedly in a very lengthy time), watermark removal would be 100% legal. To give another example, the removal of watermarks on your OWN work (for example if you lost your original and only have the watermarked copy) is 100% legal. For example, I sometimes use a watermark removal tool when I forget to turn off the date stamp on my own photos and my camera has automatically inserted them.

Reply   |   Comment by Carolyn Wu  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)

Carolyn Wu, How many people on GOTD are professional photographers who need a free program to remove a watermark? And, just to say it, the copyright remains on the image for 95 years, or in some cases 70 years after the death of the artist. So if you are getting your free software to remove a watermark and use an image, then know that you can be sued.

This is from Carolyn E. Wright of the Law Office of Carolyn E. Wright, LLC. "The DMCA also provides for certain damages when your work is infringed. If the infringer has removed your copyright management information, such as your name, contact information, or copyright notice, from your work in an attempt to facilitate or conceal its infringement, the infringer may have violated the DMCA. Section 1202(b) of the DMCA prohibits the removal of “copyright management information” in certain circumstances. It states in pertinent part:

No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law—(1) intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information . . . . knowing, or, with respect to civil remedies . . . having reasonable grounds to know, that it will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of any right under this title.

The statutory award for each violation of Section 1202 ranges from $2,500 to $25,000. The DMCA is another important tool in the photographer’s legal toolkit."

We work HARD for our images. I for one do not want my work STOLEN, MODIFIED, or ALTERED without my permission. That is why I have model releases, property releases, and try to stay within the limits of the law. I've got photographs in a number of major publications, and can tell you that getting those images is not easy... it takes study, time, effort, the cost of models, the cost of fuel, equipment, and most important, TIME. Taking an image that does not belong to you is stealing.

Reply   |   Comment by Matthew  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#12

can this remove moustache on people ?

Reply   |   Comment by Apu  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Apu, right after a razor, I would rather suggest InPaint for that purpose. Because in InPaint you can choose precisely with what part of your face you want to replace your moustache, while you can't in PSR, which will replace it with what is finds around it, i.e. little bits of your nostrils, lips, even spectacles, and I don't even want to think of the result. But I am sure you are very handsome with your moustache.

Reply   |   Comment by ouialaraison  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+18)

ouialaraison, thank you, my grandma says im very handsome with my moustache that i look like johann strauss. i believe you are very prettiful and handsomest as well. ok i will try InPaint for visa purposes , i ned my green card mayne

Reply   |   Comment by Apu  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+5)

Apu, I forgot to add that you could try to remove that bluedanubesque moustache of yours with the clone stamp in PSD, but I can't make it work, I would be interested to know if it is just me... and I sure am the handsomest female in Paris... even without a moustache.

PS - InPaint for a green card application?! Oh, well... I have no dog in that fight...

Reply   |   Comment by ouialaraison  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+6)
#11

Inpaint by Teorex, which is periodically given away here is the benchmark in this category. I've been using it for years. It does NOT expire and only keeps getting better with each version. The list price only is $19.99 not $49.99.

Reply   |   Comment by Gary  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+18)

Gary,

"Inpaint by Teorex, which is periodically given away here is the benchmark in this category. "

Actually I believe that's a bit of an apples & oranges sort of comparison... Inpaint & similar can work well when you're removing an entire object, whereas a logo or watermark may be imprinted across the main subject of an image or video, often effecting areas with enough detail that a quick bit of inpainting would obscure.

That said, if you go through the work of creating a mask [or masks] selection in an image editing app, you could try inpainting, or cloning, or painting, or maybe even all 3 to see what got the best results.

Reply   |   Comment by mike  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)

mike, I zoom in really tight and remove a logo in pieces. It works really well. Choosing the donor area is critical. I use the erase donor object more than any other object.

Reply   |   Comment by Gary  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#10

To those who are wondering if this program will install and run on an old XP SP3 system, yes! I made myself the "guinea pig" and tried it- installed and runs fine.
Two side notes:
1. I tried to unsubscribe using the "unsubscribe" link in the registration email; it does not work (I got a error of "Oops! the page you are looking for could not be found.") so maybe the moral of the story here is use a disposable email for this one!
2. It has an automatic update check that cannot be disabled (not that I could find). Well, it *technically* has a setting in the registry but it's useless as the program ignores that setting and checks anyway! (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\softorbits\PhotoStampRemover)

Reply   |   Comment by Trying 2 b Helpful  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+23)
#9

All my other SoftOrbits programs have now de-registered, I thought they had fixed this problem, obviously not.

Reply   |   Comment by Joe  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+31)

Joe, I suggest you click the link on my post below.

Reply   |   Comment by ouialaraison  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+10)
#8

So I see that I'm not alone with the deactivation of the program. Photo Stamp Remover will still remove the undesirable object but will not save it. My workaround is to use Photo Stamp Remover first followed by Windows Snipping Tool to save the cleaned up picture. I realize that this is not practicle for most but it works for me.

Reply   |   Comment by dert  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+10)
#7

I had to try this out, I use a three letter monogram as a 'watermark' that's pretty big when sending images to clients, it stops people from keeping them instead of purchasing the actual image. OK to be fair its a large and complicated watermark...so I didn't REALLY expect it to work. I tried using this to remove that watermark...it totally failed and made a mess of the image. And I'm glad of it...it means that the method I use works ( so far )!

Reply   |   Comment by Ian Campbell-Harris  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+15)

Ian Campbell-Harris, People don't understand that a photographer may spend four or five thousand dollars to get some of the images they jsut take for granted. Equpment and constant upgrades, cameras, heck some of the CMOS's cost int he 20-30,000.00 range and that is money that we need BACK from the sale of the pictures. I need the income to keep doing what I do.

So when I see a giveaway that basically threatens my livelihood, I'm NOT amused.

Reply   |   Comment by Matthew  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)

Matthew, I agree...100%. I'm ( mostly ) retired now...I just do the occasional job, if it suits ME to do it. But I've had people complain ( loudly and bitterly ) the the proofs I sent them had a watermark on them...and they couldn't print them because of that...really? and there was I thinking that was the whole idea! If you don't take precautions what would happen is you end up not just working for nothing, but subsidising somebody wedding ( or whatever ).

Reply   |   Comment by Ian Campbell-Harris  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)

Ian Campbell-Harris, Had the same thing happen. "I took the proofs to Walmar to get htem printed, and they refused! What did you do!"
"You have to buy the pictures."
"You spent, what, ten minutes and want me to pay you a hundred dollars????"

Reply   |   Comment by Matthew  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#6

Allow direct entry of radius size. Slider bar is too clunky when trying to refine size of radius

Reply   |   Comment by Eloh  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#5

Some time ago, myself and another regular commenter, Suze, had a discussion with a moderator on the forum about SoftOrbits products on GOTD:

https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/452655

Reply   |   Comment by ouialaraison  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+31)

@ ouialaraison: Kudos to you for being kind enough to draw that forum thread to the attention of others here (and for initiating that thread, too.) Kudos, too, to GOTD for facilitating that forum / forum thread and for featuring your post here.

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+12)

ouialaraison, Indeed ;-) Let's hope these products now "stick" -- time will tell . . .

Reply   |   Comment by Suze  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)
#4

@ Bob...

Seems like the proverbial "irresistible force meeting an immovable object" doesn't it? Who wins?

But in this case, there is a third way, which is what I, as a professional photographer would want to use it for -- not removing someone ELSE's watermarks (or even my own), but for getting rid of that equally proverbial "tree growing out of someone's head", or someone's arm encroaching into a shot, that would otherwise be "perfect".

I must admit, as a magazine photographer, I wish I had known, years ago, that these sorts of programmes were coming.... So many otherwise great shots I simply didn't shoot -- because they were ruined by something ELSE in the shot that I didn't want. True, it took digital photography to get to them (other than hand-painting, which is usually out of the question), and true also that I would have had to SAVE the photos (mostly colour slides) for years before I could go back and "fix" them.... But the point is, generally I never even shot them. This programme, and others like it, has really made digital photography worthwhile. Not that I am a recent convert of course -- after resisting it for some years, I embraced it about 8-9 years ago. Nowadays I use "digital enhancement" as a matter of course. And this programme is one of the most useful. Get it now -- even if you only begin to find its uses later.

Reply   |   Comment by Tranmontane  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)

@ Tranmontane:

As a professional photographer, you're doing yourself few favors by restricting yourself to one-horse software like this. In our studios, we use Adobe CS and a ton of other high-end stuff . . . but for a quick yet comprehensive make-over (when there's a rush to draft visuals for a mis-scheduled client presentation) then the go-to, amazingly enough, is this:

http://www.movavi.com/picture-editor/

Movavi has featured on GOTD in the past (which was how I discovered it) but nowadays seems -- deservedly -- to have developed so substantial a customer base that its giveaways are rare.

Photo Editor works superbly well, the Movavi algorithms noticeably superior to those in other software products (and especially, the removal of unwanted objects from images.) Nothing I've seen from any developer (and in my line of work, we've tried 'em all) has equalled Movavi's performance or deceptively simple ease-of-use.

Cheap enough to purchase outright by anyone with a love of picture-taking -- we're not talking Adobe-style stratospheric costs here -- I'd commend Movavi to you in your life as a professional photographer. . . as well as commend it to everyone who isn't.

As to today's offer, it's definitely worth trying in the same way that so many others (like inPaint, for example) are worth investigating. But don't try / don't investigate in isolation: software like this needs a price and quality benchmark -- and that benchmark is Movavi Photo Editor, which should be trial-downloaded, too.

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+21)

MikeR, I whole-heartedly agree with you about Movavi Photo Editor. Plus -- it does not "deactivate" itself ;-)

Reply   |   Comment by Suze  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#3

I downloaded twice! Extracted files & it's nowhere to be seen. Isn't a shortcut or icon placed on your desktop?

Reply   |   Comment by Beatleboy  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-4)

Beatleboy, Did you extract to a folder - or did you choose : Extract here ? For the registration proces, it's important to do things exactly as adviced. My advice : Run CCleaner and try once more. Good luck.....and for everybody : Please don't remove "owner tag"! Just remove unwanted objects ;-)

Reply   |   Comment by Allan  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+5)

Allan , why did you add a ;) at the end of your comment? Where you joking about your entire answer or just part of it? Which part were you just joking about? I'm all confused now!

Reply   |   Comment by Swamp Thing  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-10)

Swamp Thing, Hi, it's just a friendly smiley, and of course, I don't joke, when I try to help a fellow user out.

However, I quit the comment section in future, as long as the "entitled to" segment is ruling in here. I'm sure, the voting system is fixed somehow to be still more negative and unfriendly. Thanks to the team behind GAOTD anyway - and, SoftOrbits for the generous offer.

Reply   |   Comment by Allan  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#2

Love it, the same company sells you software to add watermarks to your photos to "protect" them
http://www.softorbits.com/batch-picture-watermark/
"By using the program, digital photos can be effectively protected from unauthorized use. This photo watermark software places permanent watermarks that cannot be removed."

...So, one adds watermarks that cannot be removed and this one removes watermarks.
Has anyone got Batch Picture Protector installed to try

Reply   |   Comment by Bob  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+11)

Bob, It actually makes perfect sense :)

Reply   |   Comment by Am* R***  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-7)

Bob, It could seem a bit odd. However, the program has a lot of features besides. The ability to remove the original owner's tag will not be used in this household. Take a look here : http://www.softorbits.com/photo-stamp-remover/

Reply   |   Comment by Allan  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-3)
#1

Installed on Win 10 X64. no problems,works perfectly.
registration was simple and fast!

Reply   |   Comment by Myk Kelly  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)

Myk Kelly,

But it will not last. I also find all SoftOrbits programs have de-registered themselves on my computers. Please read the third comment, where I found out that I am not the only one this is happening to.

Reply   |   Comment by Terry  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+20)
Add a comment
Facebook comments

iPhone app giveaways »

Picture Perfect - All in one Photo Editor Giveaway
Picture Perfect is a fun and simple way to make beautiful photos in seconds!
$1.99 ➞ free today
Teen & Adult Phonics Library Giveaway
Offers a growing collection of sequential, decodable digital novels with edgy, engaging themes designed to appeal to te.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Howl: A formant synthesizer Giveaway
HOWL is a simple vocoder/synthesiHOWL is a simple vocoder/synthesizerzer.
$1.99 ➞ free today
Pickle Ball: in Colorado Giveaway
This App Is a guide for those who like to play racket sport like tennis.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Videos in Video Giveaway
Fast and easy-to-use video editing application!
$5.99 ➞ free today

Android app giveaways »

World Clock Widget + Giveaway
Highly accurate international timezone for all countries around the world.
$4.99 ➞ free today
LASERBREAK Pro Giveaway
A highly addictive, challenging and seriously fun experience.
$1.99 ➞ free today
Star Walk - Night Sky Guide: Planets and Stars Map Giveaway
Star Walk - Night Sky Guide: Planets and Stars Map.
$2.99 ➞ free today
Bloom Icon Pack Giveaway
Circular icons will never go out of fashion.
$0.99 ➞ free today
CE Map - Interactive Conan Exiles Map Giveaway
This application will be a fully featured location and marker resource for all.
$0.99 ➞ free today