Gordon,

"Every photo I have is a unique ... most of the photos will be ruined if one setup applied to all of the photos."

Often people think of batch processing images as something that someone selling online would use preparing their product images, & while that is true, it's more common otherwise than many might think. Somewhat higher end apps like Lightroom or ON1 RAW etc. all let you save presets & easily apply those to many photos, whether you're going for a signature look for a series or enhancing photos from a single shoot. That doesn't mean processing has to stop there -- it might just get a lot of stuff efficiently out of the way, so that you can focus just on the individualized tweaks to make a good photo great.

Batch Image Enhancer Pro is more involved, with the ability to set conditions, action sequences etc. in a somewhat script-like format. I'm in the process of scanning thousands of old prints, focusing much more on just getting it done rather than making each one a masterpiece, and for that the more limited Photolemur works well, although I have had to process some badly faded batches separately in a more capable app. Engelmann has a couple of batch processing apps that have more features than Photolemur [though not as many as Batch Image Enhancer Pro], but getting the images through Photolemur is faster, which is why I use it. While many of the filters [actions] in Batch Image Enhancer Pro are gimmicky, it does have roughly a dozen that might work on with those faded photos, so I'm giving it a try, but I don't think it'll cause me to abandon processing RAW photos in Lightroom -> Photoshop.

Gordon, you are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! There is no way this app can make all your photos correct. I have better programs that I trust before I would use this one. Thanks anyways.

Recommending a lightweight alternative that is really connected to a premium PAY program? Getting tired of this nonsense! No thanks! I'll stick with the free FULL program offered here today!

John Smith,

If you think this is a full program you are a fool.
Reason being that in order to get a full program one needs to upgrade the "Professional" version offered here.

Niv,

Lots of folks aren't into heavily editing their photos because it takes a bit of time, so batch processing is a middle ground, where you can make them look better without spending all day on it. OTOH, most every photo can benefit from adjusting levels for example, so you can use Batch Image Enhancer Pro to do that sort of thing more quickly than is possible when editing each one individually, and that can save you time, since you can focus only on the individual tweaks you want while you're in that photo editor.

Ari, asking question and getting negative marking -1

in the description above one of the bullet points does say quite clearly:

•Correct small focus problems with Sharpen filter

Is that not what you asked when the answer was already written plainly for all to see from the start of the giveaway? That is probably why a few people voted your question as no a useful question as it was already answered before you visited the page. If you mean AI and complex comprehensive image refocussing from a single image then your question did not specific enough to imply that.

TK, No, when I had asked the question there wasn't such reply as you mentioned. But I appreciate your reply which is helpful to understand my above question.

TK,

"Sharpen" is not the same as "deblur" and a good image processing program will treat each differently. "Deblur" applies to the overall image the same, and "sharpen" applies to edges differently than it does to the overall image.

You can find research online to learn more. Yao Wang, Ph.D. at Polytech Institute of New York has done some indepth study of the differences.

Even though the program may list "Sharpen" as a feature, it does not mean that it also does deblur. Most users may be satisfied with a sharpen feature, but when comparing the same image with both methods applied to two different resultant images, only then will the difference be apparent enough to realize that sharpen does not solve all images.

Gary, I believe I already stated as much, though without citing external research of course.

Nektar, 3 years is fair, but it appears to be giving plenty time to UPGRADE based on following comments.

Allen Shoudy, thank you for the remark, I admit I had not tested this.
(Thanks also for correcting my bad English)