Apple won in US court, but Apple, Samsung both lose in South Korean court, be back in court
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10829382
Samsung stung after Apple patent war
A jury has ruled for Apple in its huge smartphone patent infringement case involving Samsung and ordered Samsung to pay US$1.05 billion.
Samsung's lawyers countered that it was simply and legally giving consumers what they want: Smart phones with big screens. They said Samsung didn't violate any of Apple's patents and further alleged innovations claimed by Apple were actually created by other companies.
Samsung conceded that Apple makes great products but said it doesn't have a monopoly on the design of rectangle phones with rounded corners that it claimed it created.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57500504-71/legal-analysts-suggest-apple-samsung-verdict-may-not-be-safe/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-24/apple-samsung-infringed-each-other-s-patents-seoul-court-says.html
Apple, Samsung Must Stop Some Korea Sales in Patent Fight
Apple, maker of the iPhone, violated two Samsung patents related to mobile-data transfer technologies, the Seoul Central District Court said today. Samsung, the world’s largest mobile- phone maker, infringed one Apple patent related to a “bounce- back” touchscreen feature, though the Suwon, South Korea-based company didn’t copy the design of the iPhone, the court said.
The sales bans don’t cover Apple’s iPhone 4S, its newest iPad
https://www.pcworld.com/article/261446/applesamsung_verdict_doesnt_give_microsoft_the_win.html
Apple-Samsung Verdict Doesn't Give Microsoft the Win
"Windows Phone is looking gooooood right now," Microsoft's Senior Director of Windows Phone Marketing Bill Cox exclaimed on Twitter
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_21412812/apple-samsung-court-battle-was-part-larger-war
Apple-Samsung court battle was part of larger war between Apple, Google
http://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmoorhead/2012/08/27/what-is-google-really-saying-with-its-post-apple-samsung-verdict-talking-points/?partner=yahootix
”The court of appeals will review both infringement and the validity of the patent claims.”
https://www.examiner.com/article/google-forced-to-respond-to-apple-samsung-ruling
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/business/news/article_1654408.php/Apple-Samsung-in-patent-dispute-in-Australia
Apple, Samsung in patent dispute in Australia
Aug 2, 2011, 0:45 GMT
Sydney - South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co Ltd has postponed the launch of its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer in Australia in a patent dispute with Apple Inc that centres on its likeness to the US company's iPad 2
http://www.zdnet.com/asian-consumers-worry-about-innovation-in-apple-samsung-aftermath-7000003222/
Asian consumers worry about innovation in Apple-Samsung aftermath
http://betanews.com/2012/08/27/5-reasons-the-apple-samsung-ruling-is-bad-for-everyone/
5 reasons the Apple-Samsung ruling is BAD for everyone
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/24/business/korea-apple-samsung/
Apple, Samsung both lose in South Korean court
Samsung and Apple both lose in a South Korean patent case.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
A South Korea court ruled that both Apple and Samsung violated each other's patents
Samsung must pay $35,300 for infringing two Apple patents for iPhone and iPad
Apple was found to have infringed Samsung's Wi-Fi technology, and must pay $22,000