I have temporarily disabled all antiviruses but still, I can not register!!!

DB, I think you'll find the whole crux of why this ProBalance family of programs exist is that WIndows uses a hybrid co-operative/pre-emptive time slice multi-tasking scheme with multi-threading bolted on and if a program is not designed to co-operatively relinquish the CPU back to the process manager Process Lasso aims to reduce the badly behaved processes priority to below normal to maintain system responsiveness, the addition of thread affinity dynamic managment is used when a program is purposly nastily designed to take all resources in all CPU threads and never co-operate with the process managing of the OS so is only controlled by process priority and CPU core affinity. As processes like that can cook modern CPU's that have a turbo-boost facility that are designed so they can thermally handle short periods of turbo-boost overclocking but will exceed design parameters if stressed by long periods of turbo-boost overclocking like can happen with nastily written multi-core aware video reencoding to HEVC UHD or higher resolutions. In those circumstances ProBalance should dynamically be able to reduce the process priority to below normal or even to idle and potentially restrict the runaway process to a reduced number of cores to protect the CPU from thermal runaway. I am not aware that ProBalance places any restriction on process memory allocation thresholds or restrictions as that would hypothetically be very counter productive either breaking processes by denying an allocation request or forcing the process to swap its address space to paging files which would be counter productive if seeking continuous system responsiveness AND process stability. Of course I could be wrong in any of my inferances on how and what ProBalance plus Affinity governance does and does not do and would look forward to being corrected by someone that KNOWS better :-)

Yes, I also got no information in my mail box

Artur, hi I first did have same issue at first but I uninstalled it and reinstalled it ... looked in my email for it did not find it until I went to junk mail ... It well say Bitsum Technologies on it that would be the one.

Howie, it be in your junk mail and it well say Bitsum Technologies

Lourdes,hi I have already written that I WAS looking inside
the spam mail (aka junk mail) too. No e-mails from Bitsum.

Artur, this is why I do not particiapte in license retrieval on giveaways where the vendor insisits on providing an email based personal data harvesting exercise with no specific privacy policy on the storage and re-use of the harvested personal data when there is always a high probability we won't even retrieve the license we practiaclly sold our personal data for. I personaly find giveawayoftheday.com administered email distribution of contributed license keys to be mostly reliable and to date not a serious concern of their data re-use.

I may consider retrieving a license from a vendors web server if they provide the required key on the thank you page after form submission but not all do this. Bitsum don't so I have only ever tested their giveaways as non-activated trials so they never remain on my systems or get to the familiarity level that could result in providing referals to customers and relatives and social circle.

Dave K, I'd recommed you first go read the two product home pages and connected articles and if anything is still unclear come back and ask something specific as you are asking an awful lot of end users to write an extended comment comparing the two products when much of that information is already published and viewable on bitsums website!

I reckon the "end user" is only looking for an opinion such as "I've got both and the are pretty much the same" or This one is much better than that one".
Don't know why you want to come off as a total boor with the type of answer you gave.
No wonder people don't find your comment usefull.

Incidently I have neither but I daresay some other "end users" will actually be helpfull unlike you.

Tam, so your point is to attempt a personal attack and not provide a useful answer to either OP comment or even constructive criticisim of my reply which would have probably given the OP ALL the information they asked for if they followed the suggestions and not some cut down one liner you suggest due to your assumption that the poster did not mean what they ASKED that does NOT address the crux of the question as THEY ARE NOT VISUALLY or FUNCTIONALLY the same but they do both perform similar functions comments about HAVE already been publicly visible BEFORE the OP posted so therefore was probably not the answer the OP wanted or else they would not have posted or they never refreshed their page to read latest comments.... What is a "boor"? I am aware of a boar and a bore but not a "boor" could you please be more specific with your attempted insults as I am not sure if am supposed to be offended or amused by your attempt at peer genereated censorship! aka trolling. Looking forward to your useful comment on the days giveaway or vendors activity...

Tam, TK already answered the same question couple hours before this one.
Some people are just too lazy to read and prefer to be spoon-fed...

Tam: Boo, Hiss.... Your answer also didn't contribute anything to the conversation or contain any useful information. If you want to troll I hope you'll do it on another site where people don't need information but just throw barbs.

TK, Thanks for the tip. I have noticed a long time ago that some tools count four cores in my desktop, other only two. Perhaps their finding explains that: "This means that 2 of the 4 dies in these CPUs do not have memory channels attached to them. They must instead pass all memory requests through the Infinity Fabric chip interconnect."

Gideon, From the FAQ section on the product home page:

"Already Using Process Lasso?

You can install both products, but it is recommended to choose one or the other. If you need the extended features of Process Lasso, then use it since it also contains all that CPUBalance offers. If you are already using Process Lasso, there is no need for CPUBalance."

I think you can consider cpubalance as processor Lasso extra light with a much simpler user interface and reduced granularity of user customisation But of course I could be wrong, I am only going by screenshots and feature listings bitsum publish.

TK,
Thanks for the info,
I don't see process lasso as complicated to operate software. first, it comes pre-configured for optimizing PC computation resources pretty well. Second, following initial quite simple installation and few clicks to choose from recommended settings, it works in "set and forgets" mode for as long as you not thinking of changing something. Hence, I think I'll stick to PL.
Thanks,

TK, Thank you for that quote about how only Process Lasso is needed. I missed seeing that information over the past few years! I installed Processor Lasso many years ago, and after A/B testing, bought a lifetime license.

Gideon, absolutely, if you have PL and have lifetime upgrade license and find it helps with taming badly written programs and you are happy with it definatly stick with it... If you have a really old lifetime license no updates giveaway of PL it may be worth considering this IF your computer has dual core or better CPU for the newer processor affinity addition to ProBalance technology... but if you don't see a need for that newer tech definatly stick with PL in almost any form over a 1 year Pro license of this.

TK, Thanks! - Exactly what I popped in here to check!