Every day we offer FREE licensed software you’d have to buy otherwise.

Clone Terminator Giveaway
$ 29
EXPIRED

Giveaway of the day — Clone Terminator

Clone Terminator is an easy-to-use program designed to clean your computer from duplicate files.
$ 29 EXPIRED
User rating: 270 (34%) 528 (66%) 41 comments

Clone Terminator was available as a giveaway on December 22, 2010!

Today Giveaway of the Day
$58.95
free today
Edit videos and create slideshow videos efficiently and effortlessly.

Clone Terminator is an easy-to-use program designed to clean your computer from duplicate files. With the help of Clone Terminator, you can easily scan your drives for identical files and delete those of them that you never use. It will increase space on your drives and improve total system performance.

Today the Developer is going to reward 3 best improvement suggestion with personal licenses for MultiStage Recovery. So share your valuable ideas and win the prize!

Use Idea Informer widget to submit your feedback and do not forget to fill in your name and e-mail – otherwise the Developer will not be able to contact you in case you are the one to win!

System Requirements:

Windows XP/Vista/7/NT 4.0 (with SP4)/2000/2003

Publisher:

Enplase Research

Homepage:

http://enplase.com/pages/Clone+Terminator+description.html

File Size:

3.69 MB

Price:

$ 29

GIVEAWAY download basket

Developed by Informer Technologies, Inc.
View, manage, encrypt, pack, and unpack archive files.
Heal up your system and speed up your PC with the help of 25.
Developed by IObit

Comments on Clone Terminator

Thank you for voting!
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.
#41

@27 mike - thanks for your help but IE8 didn't do the trick I'm afraid. Sill the same problem, missing dll.

@32 fubar - thanks for suggesting the Visual C++ 2005 ATL Security Update. I will try that later.

[quote] "The bigger issue is, why are any of you running XP?" [unquote]
When we would be playing a game, I wouldn't like it, if rules were being changed while playing.
Given the fact of using a XP OS, what could be a solution for the missing dll problem, was the question.

This can logically not be "not using XP" or "use a magical wand", nor using an other "Duplicate Files Finder". Yes thinking with my brain amuses me.
But trying Visual C++ 2005 ATL Security Update could be somethiing usable.
Try not to make things too simple by making your own rules but stick to the rules of plain logic. :)

Reply   |   Comment by Zolvan  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#40

#26, I don't know why you would get a WOT, sorry. All I can tell you is that I've been using it for years, and have nothing bad to say about it. I run regular virus/malware/spyware scans, and they've never picked up anything regarding the program. I've tried a couple of other dupe-finder programs, but this one seems to be the one I keep going back to.

Reply   |   Comment by Shawn  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#39

Thank you. And thanks for all the comments - always helpful in making a decision.

Reply   |   Comment by Robin  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#38

#31 Tad, I can't even get to the stage of activating with GOTD. The message says that it can't reach the server try again later. Any ideas please.

Reply   |   Comment by Will W.  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#37

There is no indication as to where to put the registration key. When I click about it says registered to GAOTD. Any comment on this?

Reply   |   Comment by adlchess  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#36

#1, BuBBy
You are mistaken with your first point, Sir! v3.0 already had XP/vista support. That's of course why Ivan Grynko in his comment doesn't list it as new.

What's still really missing, though, is not only multi-language support (Mr Grynko, do you need manpower for translations?) but in the first place an intelligent search parameter algorithm resp. strategy.

In my view, it's next to *useless* spitting out dozens or hundreds of folders all named "group [N1-Nx]" containing files of the exact same byte number that may or may NOT be true duplicates of an identical CONTENT.
IMHO there's much room for improvement: (1.) The folders (left pane) ought to be named according to the matching file names (that now can be found just at the end of the installation path forcing you to scroll; e.g. "Mickey.doc") and (2.) should furthermore be taggable in order to make it possible getting them combined and/or sorted by user-defined categories/tags. (3.) It would be quite advantageous being able to exclude from the search not only file formats but specified syntax parameters as well like [*hot], [j*], [x-z] or [0].

Until the functionality has been polished all over, I wouldn't shell out anything for this program. As it stands now, the use of CT is virtually restricted to searches in small up to medium-sized folders. Trying a folder like "My documents" will always leave a major part of the chore to the user!

Reply   |   Comment by man fred  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)
#35

It would be nice if this program could list the compared files in a tree-like screen (in addition to grouping them) and allow printing the list. I would like to be able to have a physical copy to check the files at my leisure. It seems to be marking them by file size. Not all my files of the same size are duplicates.

Program ran quickly, and was easy to use. Nice interface.

Thanks #31 for the tip. :)

Reply   |   Comment by GMO  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#34

As promised, here is the next stage.

The group view is essentially useless with a large number of duplicates. I have more than 69,000 groups which are simply impossible to navigate. I should be able to choose the largest duplicates first to get the biggest bang for the buck of my deletions.

For some files, you need to have administrator privielge to delete them. It should be an option during install if it by default starts in admin mode.

I also don't like the way the deletes happen or does not happen. I can press shift-del and it shows that the file got deleted in some cases. In others nothing happens and the same list is again displayed.

If you hit Next Group and are at the bottom of the pane the group window is not scrolled. Makes it very tedious with lots of groups.

The application also said that it processed only 65% of the files when it displayed the the delete group window. However, when I closed the group window in the hope that it would finish the search job the whole application shut down. As it took at least half an hour to get there this wasn't very pleasant.

This application needs a lot more work to intuitively and productively handle large file repositories.

Reply   |   Comment by regli  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#33

#29 Copy and paste the Name and License key. If it still doesn't register the product, delete it,re-download and try again.

Reply   |   Comment by GMO  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-1)
#32

11, gergn, see How to fix DWMAPI.DLL delay-load dependency under WinXP. Note that one possible solution is to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 ATL Security Update. The bigger issue is, why are any of you running XP? It's seriously obsolete, I put those running XP in the same category as those running Windows 3.1.

Duplicate Files Finder, which I mentioned in my comment #15, is not only very much faster than Clone Terminator and without the numerous bugs, but is much safer, supporting hardlinks and symlinks. There are implications to using those. A symlink is generally safer than a deletion; a hardlink, where possible, is safer still.

I find it amusing that people will thumbs-down my comments for no reason. Many people here would prefer to follow those who don't have a degree in computer science, never have been and never will be programmers, and spout nonsense under the guise of technical knowledge.

Duplicate Files Finder has a slightly cumbersome UI which requires a very small amount of effort to figure out. My opinion is that if you need to have your hand held to use something that simple, perhaps you should take remedial reading, an introductory course on using Windows, and learn how to use your brain to solve simple problems. Where applicable, Duplicate Files Finder uses the semicolon as a separator, and it supports standard Windows multi-select on the results page. Lest you think I'm being too harsh, how will you earn a living? I wouldn't hire anyone who couldn't solve the simplest of problems. I don't buy the "I don't know anything about computers" argument. Learn.

Reply   |   Comment by Fubar  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-5)
#31

DON'T FORGET TO GO TO THE 'ABOUT' AREA AND REGISTER THE PRODUCT. JUST BECAUSE IT'S ACTIVATED BY GOTD DOESN'T MEAN ITS REGISTERED WITH THE PUBLISHER!!

Reply   |   Comment by Tad  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)
#30

Downloaded and ran, it immediately goes into a wizard type process. I would have preferred the ability to set things up manually, but some people like wizards. The scan was pretty fast, but the application lacks options for file types, and comparisons. There aren't many "buttons" to tweak, but how can you complain while it's free. I have been an avid user of another application call Easy Duplicate Finder (www.easyduplicatefinder.com) for years. It use to be free, but it's now a paid program. But the price is the same as this one ($29) and is far superior in every aspect. Someone else mention the lack of controls to select duplicates once found. I agree, the other program I use excels in helping you select duplicates plus it is iTune compatible so you can search by music tag. This is a good free program, but I'd look elsewhere if I'm going to pay for one of these programs.

Reply   |   Comment by Mike S.  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+1)
#29

I cannot get the program to recognise the registry key given in the DL. Any ideas? Im concerned because I will probably NOT be on comp again all day. Thanks.

Reply   |   Comment by Robin R  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)
#28

> Some Dutch XP-users experience a Missing DWMAPI.DLL error.

And English XP too. And I do have IE8, though no DWMAPI.DLL.

DWMAPI.DLL does show in the Import Table of Clone Terminator.exe.

Reply   |   Comment by therube  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#27

#11: "Some Dutch XP-users experience a Missing DWMAPI.DLL error."

According to this article at Novell http://goo.gl/hR9U9 "DWMAPI.DLL does not exist on any non-Vista box.". Win7 uses it too, but it's not on my XP installs. Process Explorer [SysInternals at Microsoft http://goo.gl/wBfYo ] doesn't show any use of anything Internet Explorer. That doesn't mean with 100% certainty that something using that file isn't involved on Dutch versions of Windows -- you might try Process Monitor yourself [it's a small, free, download that doesn't need install] & that *might* show you something to at least use with Google/Bing.

#23: "... Perhapse there are shared components in IE that are used in other apps, I don’t know. Could updating to IE8 perhaps solve my problem?"

Windows updates normally cover Internet Explorer, so if auto-updates is on your install is probably not *too* badly off. That said, Google using "DWMAPI.DLL error" & you'll come up with some references to un-installing/removing ie7, & updating to ie8 would probably be a good move anyway -- while I don't see Clone Terminator using Internet Explorer, many other apps do.

Reply   |   Comment by mike  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)
#26

#6 DigitalVolcano’s Duplicate Cleaner give me a WOT warning. Any idea why?

Reply   |   Comment by Mpad  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-4)
#25

Whenever I see anything about software that looks/searches for duplicate files, my 1st question is a cautious: "Why"? If you've got loads of mp3s your cataloging software [for example MediaMonkey -- http://goo.gl/KNWlo ] can likely do that for you. Otherwise *the most common* duplicate files should stay where they are, as they have something to do with running Windows or making your software work. Enplase Research realizes that, & Clone Terminator pops up a warning to stick to folders where you store personal files -- a nice touch. With a wizard type interface, once scanning finishes you're shown a resizable Editor window with duplicate files organized into groups along the left side. Files appear in the main, central portion of the window, while at the bottom you get a preview of supported files, & across the menu bar you get buttons to Open Folder, Run, Remove, & Delete file. Missing is any help or documentation. Going just by the files in the program's folder, Clone Terminator can *probably* support "PNG, BMP, JPEG, TIFF" previews [The FreeImage Project -- http://goo.gl/xnmrV ] & play most audio files including MIDI [BASS -- http://goo.gl/0Oc6 ].

Clone Terminator would be portable if not for the folder it adds to User\ Application [or App] Data. Setup adds one registry key for uninstall, & you get the program's folder with 12 files taking up ~9.5 MB.

Hard drives have never been cheaper, and with USB 3 starting to take hold, you'll soon be able to access external drives [almost] as fast as the internal ones, and without the hassles of eSATA [often have to shut down to unplug, stiff cables are a PITA, & >1 TB may just not work for you]. Which means for the most part we've left the dark ages, when it was unfortunately common to have this nagging worry about the shrinking free space on your PC's/laptop's hard drive. Nowadays duplicate file Hunter-Killers are more about taking out the trash, getting rid of some of the clutter so you can find things -- included as a feature in a cataloging app it can make deciding what to keep easier [e.g. do you *really* still want every one of those YouTube downloads, let alone 2 or more copies?]... on their own they won't help you get any more organized, & they won't find that embarrassing file before someone else does.

Reply   |   Comment by mike  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+6)
#24

I've just installed it and immediately provided it a challenge to find all duplicates on my major drives. It is now slaving away in the background.

What is immediately noticeable is that the program is not well threaded. One of my cores is extremely busy whereas the others are not busy at all. The process of filtering therefore takes much longer than it should.

Otherwise, the interface of the initial screens look fine and easy to understand. I'll likely comment further later (once the filtering is complete)...

Reply   |   Comment by regli  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#23

@ gergn: well, I just installed Firefox over a year ago now and made it my default browser. I never bothered updating IE after that, but it is still there and outdated I guess. Perhapse there are shared components in IE that are used in other apps, I don't know.
Could updating to IE8 perhaps solve my problem? Strange thing for sure. I can imagine why that Dutch user was swearing @#$%, because it is really frustrating not being able to run an app because of this.
Could you provide the URL to solve this dll problem? Thanks in advance!

Reply   |   Comment by Zolvan  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+4)
#22

Does anyone know if this program finds TRUE duplicates (using MD5 hashing or the like) or does it just find files with Duplicate Names?

Thanx!

Reply   |   Comment by Dantes Inferno  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-4)
#21

Downloaded and installed without a hitch. I ran 'My Pictures' folder through the app. Scanning speed was lightning fast and the results as far as I could tell, accurate. But I also use Duplicate Cleaner from Digital Volcano, an app that has been around a long time and successively improved over the years. It's freeware and always has been. It's backed by great support and an excellent user forum.

In use, nothing in the paid-for Clone Terminator from Enplase Research out-performed in significant respects the freeware Duplicate Cleaner from Digital Volcano. The scanning speed was marginally faster, but when I'm looking for dupes I place more emphasis on safety than speed anyway, so a supersonic scanning rate isn't of itself necessarily reassuring.

What's particularly noticeable about the difference between the two apps is the wealth of information generated by Duplicate Cleaner in its scan results.

In my case, the more information I have about a file for possible deletion, the better -- the preview facility in both Clone Terminator and Duplicate Cleaner is certainly welcome, but where files are concerned, there's literally more to a comparison than meets the eye.

Verdict: there's nothing wrong with Clone Terminator -- the GUI is nice, the app fast and light, the developer honest and diligent -- but it's impossible to see how the app's commercial edge can be justified. Though free today, it's still a one-time installation that can't be repeated unless paid for, whereas Duplicate Cleaner can be downloaded and re-installed free as often as one may like.

Well worth taking advantage of the developer's kind offer via GOATD today then -- because it's free! -- but it's also worth the time of anyone concerned about dupe file clutter to DL and install Duplicate Cleaner as well and then decide for themselves which suits their personal tastes the best.

Thanks, GAOTD and Enplase Research.

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+27)
#20

Pros
Fairly appealing UI. Easy to select folders to scan. Does a very thorough job of looking for duplicates, finding them regardless of filename and datestamps.
Cons
UI positioning. If you run a multiheaded desktop, it annoyingly insists on starting splatted in the middle of both screens. Should just let the OS handle the window geometry.

Very, very slow. Fed it two directories to scan, a little under 15,000 files, around 6GB. Ran it once, then immediately ran it again to accommodate disk caching. The 2nd run took almost 7 minutes. Running Auslogics free dupe finder, the same two directories, ignoring filenames and datestamps (which is not the default in Auslogics), it completed with the same results in 2 minutes, 7 seconds.

Cumbersome to delete lots of dupes. CT takes the list of duplicates and separates them into groups. You have to walk through each group one-by-one and select the appropriate file and hit the delete button each time.

Summary
While not that bad of a program, it is definitely not worth $30. Even getting it for free from GAOTD, I'm still uninstalling it since the free alternatives I already use are superior.

Reply   |   Comment by AHinMaine  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+20)
#19

Terrible program... i would expect it to scan the whole drive to find duplicates, but then it warns you that you should not do a full drive scan... then i decided to scan "My documents"; then it started but came back with a warning that it contains system files and i should not scan... what use is this if i am going to select only one little folder on my drive? I can use windows to sort by file name and look for duplicates or sort by file size, sort large to small, and accomplish the same.... 5 Thumbs DOWN... rating 1 of 5 stars. No Need To Download This Program

Reply   |   Comment by madmax  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-5)
#18

Seems to work OK. I used it on my download folder and it found over 2300 groups. Not all were dupes, but a majority were. Seems to run fast, especially since I haven't run a program like this before. Glad to have it in my arsenal. Running on a i7-930 & Win 7 Pro 64 bit. Installed and ran fine.

Reply   |   Comment by Dennis F.  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+7)
#17

@14, Zolvan: I really do not know how to solve this problem and have no idea if CloneTerminator uses IE. On my two XP's I do not have this problem, but @^@ on the Dutch site has it. He uses IE7. On all my PC's I have both IE8 and FireFox, and other browsers.
I did find the internet tip to replace IE7 with IE8 to solve this dll-problem, but that had nothing to do with CloneTerminator.

Reply   |   Comment by gergn  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#16

I did`nt find it useful.
It gives warning for everything and leaves you in doubt what to do !
I installed it , tried and uninstalled it.

Reply   |   Comment by SLN Rao  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-9)
#15

I always run into code quality problems with Enplase products, and Clone Terminator 3.5 is no exception. Slow, and generates nebulous errors about log files (fortunately, Clone Terminator can be terminated, even though the error dialogs cannot).

There are so many free and commercial duplicate finders. The open-source Duplicate Files Finder is very fast and decent.

FYI: A previous giveaway, Perfect Automation, is now free.
3Planesoft has just released a kinda cool Santa Claus screensaver, just barely in time for Christmas.

Reply   |   Comment by Fubar  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+25)
#14

@gergn: I use XP and Firefox and have a missing dll-problem too. Do you suggest to replace Firefox with IE8? What does cloneterminator do with my browser? I thought I could use any browser that comes to mind (in fact this didn't come to my mind at all) because cloneterminator does not make use of it. At least not that I know of.

Reply   |   Comment by Zolvan  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)
#13

Even though many had voted thumbs down, I downloaded and installed on W7 and ran the program. Installation was simple and clean, and running the program was also very simple. I didn't like the fact that I had to rebuild the folder list when it found a system file, but have added a suggestion on that. Otherwise, a great little utility that I'll keep.

Reply   |   Comment by Chris  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+12)
#12

In a $ 29 duplicate finder like 'Clone Terminator' one would expect to find at least the basic features such as a 'Delete Assistant' (delete only older/newer files, delete only files with shorter/longer name, keep only 1 file for each group etc.) and the possibility to configure the dupe identification criteria.

After duly considering I have decided to stay with the unbeatable 'Vistanita Duplicate Finder', which has all the above and more and also shows immediately the thumbnail view of all found duplicates, which is extremely useful when scanning for image duplicates!

Happy holidays to everybody!

Reply   |   Comment by Mark  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+12)
#11

Some Dutch XP-users experience a Missing DWMAPI.DLL error.
Any suggestions, apart from replacing IE7 by IE8?

Reply   |   Comment by gergn  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-5)
#10

A free alternative is CloneSpy at www.clonespy.com. It finds and shows any files in any user chosen folders, giving the option to delete one. Basically a free version of this program.

Reply   |   Comment by Sam  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+23)
#9

Fast, clean, simple, and it runs as advertised. I selected a sub-folder with 5892 files of 4.3 meg each. It found two pairs in 40 seconds. It looks like a keeper for me.

@7 (Lou2) The "uninstall" file is in the application's folder (unins000.exe) and it IS registered even if no shortcut was created.

Peter (XP-SP2)

Reply   |   Comment by Peter  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+30)
#8

It would be very good if duplicates could be found, when even their sizes are slightly different, due to tagging. I find it very annoying to find duplicates that are not found just because I have tagged one or both of the files.

Also, it would be great if the system file properties of the duplicates could be accessed through the program, as deciding which one to delete (depending on date or tagging) would be very useful.

Reply   |   Comment by eggbean  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+12)
#7

Aside from what others have mentioned, Apparently, it moves the file to your recycle bin, and depends on you to finally remove it. While this makes for a good safety net, it either needs to be mentioned or offered as an option.
The other thing is something that is something of a gripe of mine... there is no uninstall. Otherwise, it isn't half bad. 2 1/2 thumbs up.

Reply   |   Comment by Lou2  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)
#6

Not really impressed with today's offering. I felt like it was lacking some pretty basic options, most notably the ability to include/exclude subdirectories. I didn't really notice any difference in speed from other programs of the same type, and the results seem unnecessarily complicated. They're listed in groups, but rather than being able to go through and select numerous files in numerous pairs you have to go through one pair at a time. I also didn't see a way to select, say, files from a specific directory for deletion. At $29, I have to say that there are a number of free programs out there that have many more options. I've been very happy with DigitalVolcano's Duplicate Cleaner. The one selling point on this program seems to be the built-in warning system. If you're generally careful with cleaning out files, that probably isn't enough to warrant the $29, though.

Reply   |   Comment by Shawn  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+27)
#5

Sorry, Bubby - - - Clone Terminator last appeared on June 28, 2010 with Version 3.0. You are correct about the new features.

I have used this program since Version 2.5 and I have to say there is no better or faster duplicate finder that I have found anywhere. It shows the results side by side so you can decide which of the duplicates to keep and there is no way (besides blindness or incompetence) to delete the wrong file. If you do, it will be found in the recycle bin so you really have to go out of your way to lose a file.

The program finds duplicates by comparing the file data. The name is irrelevant so you will find the results displaying the two filenames regardless of what they are. You choose which to keep. If you are a "Doubting Thomas" you can always compare the two results using Windows File Compare but you'll never find a mistake (mismatch), the program is awesome!

Best program I've ever used to find duplicates and it has saved me a lot of space removing extra photos and music files. I love it!

Thank you GAOTD and Enplase Research!

Reply   |   Comment by Dan  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+66)
#4

Clone Terminator is a nice (and fast) duplicate file remover, it could benefit from some little optional enhancements such as include files with duplicate names to allow you to choose if these are duplicates. An example for the use would be an MP3 where the bit rate is different. However, it does exactly what it says on the tin so no complaints.

The ability to click on the files found and preview them is a useful function as it makes the decision as to deleting so much easier. Definitely a keeper for me.

Reply   |   Comment by Colin Wiffen  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+26)
#3

I'm so happy to have the opportunity to get new ideas and advices from you! I hate marketing bullshit, so I won't waste your time :)

In this new version of Clone Terminator you can find:
1. Built-in warning system (tries not to allow an user to scan/delete system or program files)
2. Support for more formats in built-in preview system.
3. Improved stability.

Thank you for your criticism and have a nice day!

Reply   |   Comment by Ivan Grynko  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+72)
#2

Fantastic program thumbs up

Reply   |   Comment by justin  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-117)
#1

Clone Terminator last appeared on Giveawayoftheday.com on June 28, 2010 with version 3.0.

Now at version 3.5 it has seen some changes.

1. Windows Vista/7 support.

2. Improved interface (new editor of equal file groups, built-in multi-format preview system, etc)

3. Improved speed and stability (now Clone Terminator is one of the fastest duplicate finder program on the market).
4. Built-in new warning system (try to prevent a user deleting system/program files)

Reply   |   Comment by BuBBy  –  10 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+84)
Add a comment

iPhone app giveaways »

ASL Interactive Dictionary Giveaway
ASL Interactive provides a simple, easy to navigate American Sign Language dictionary.
$5.99 ➞ free today
Shortcut  Pro - Icons Changer Giveaway
Customize your home screen with 1000+ custom icons!
$2.99 ➞ free today
Football Emojis - Touchdown Giveaway
Add super cool football emojis to your text messages with the new Football Emoji app!
$1.99 ➞ free today
DiscountApp Giveaway
DiscountApp helps you make a quick choice while shopping with discounts.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Pixel Fighting Ninja Combat 3D Giveaway
You need to fight brawl alien use all your karate and kung fu.
$0.99 ➞ free today

Android app giveaways »

Address Book Pro Giveaway
You can add custom fields to contacts, address, phone numbers, and email addresses.
$2.49 ➞ free today
Livemocha: Special Edition Giveaway
With the Livemocha Special Version, you can learn more about your chosen language.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Korean Translator Giveaway
English to Korean translator that talks to you.
$1.49 ➞ free today
Dr.Falcon Driving Safety Giveaway
Includes a visual and audible warning system (safe drive).
$0.99 ➞ free today
Home Workouts Gym Pro (No ad) Giveaway
The application is for those who love to practice gym without the time and ability to visit gym.
$1.49 ➞ free today