Every day we offer FREE licensed software you’d have to buy otherwise.

Photo Stamp Remover 7.5 Giveaway
$49.99
EXPIRED

Giveaway of the day — Photo Stamp Remover 7.5

Remove watermarks, date stamps and other unwanted objects from photographs!
$49.99 EXPIRED
User rating: 226 (82%) 51 (18%) 30 comments

Photo Stamp Remover 7.5 was available as a giveaway on December 23, 2015!

Today Giveaway of the Day
$19.50
free today
Spot potential problems before they result in an irrecoverable data loss.

Photo Stamp Remover is a photo correction utility that can remove watermarks, date stamps and other unwanted objects that appear on photographs. Offering a fully automatic process, the program provides an intelligent restoration technology to fill the selected area with the texture generated from the pixels around the selection, so that the defect blends into the rest of the image naturally.

What takes hours to correct using the clone tool, can be accomplished in a minute using Photo Stamp Remover.

Purchase an Unlimited Personal license (with support and updates) at 70% discount!

System Requirements:

Windows 7/ 8/ 10

Publisher:

SoftOrbits

Homepage:

http://www.softorbits.com/photo-stamp-remover/

File Size:

15.8 MB

Price:

$49.99

GIVEAWAY download basket

Developed by CyberLink Corp.
Developed by PhotoInstrument
Create, manage, copy and edit custom images.
Developed by Mirillis Ltd.

Comments on Photo Stamp Remover 7.5

Thank you for voting!
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.
#10

Helpful article. Thank you very much. Another great utility that is must have for digital photography is Binfer. An easy way to deliver photos to clients.

Reply   |   Comment by Adrianna  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#9

Why won't it let you close one image before you open another? I might like to leave the app running without any image showing when I go eat, take a break, whatever.

Reply   |   Comment by romith  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#8

At the moment, the website shows there are 15 hours left to install the software. I clicked on setup and it said the giveawayoftheday is expired. something wrong here.

Reply   |   Comment by luu nguyen  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#7

How is version 7.5 different from version 7.1?

Reply   |   Comment by Juan  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-6)

Juan
difference is .04

Reply   |   Comment by frank  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-6)

frank
mon erreur, it's 0.4
pls disregard prev.

Reply   |   Comment by frank  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-1)
#6

Digital.
Millennium.
Copyright.
Act.

I wonder what the people at SoftOrbits would say if someone developed a programme to make it easier to steal their products by stripping out copyright and other identifying items.

I know, I know, some of you will immediately scream that this product is to remove spots and imperfections from photos. Yeah, right. The very first thing in the list of what it removes is watermarks and 99% of the people who do that are doing it to steal a photo. Just because someone ranting in indignation in reply to this uses it for something else changes nothing. This programme helps people steal and as usual, this post will be deleted within minutes because no one wants to admit that. As a photographer and writer and publisher who has had my work stolen and bootlegged, I have no sympathy for thieves and less sympathy for the frothing-at-the-mouth people who defend thieves.

Reply   |   Comment by Jeff  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-22)

Jeff
The principle of what you say is correct, but you can not blame the tool or the tool maker --- just like you can not blame the gun or the gun maker. Freedom is NOT free.

Reply   |   Comment by freecat  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+9)

Jeff I´ve had photo´s stolen from me too, years ago, and, even worse, by a rivalling company .... so I can relate to your indignation.
But... this program poses no threat if you place watermarks the right way (big size, middle of the photo, 3d effect with transparancy & shadows, etc.). I´ve never had photo´s "stolen" again ...

Reply   |   Comment by Lucky Luke  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+18)

Jeff I've worked for years with some of the world's biggest advertising agencies, complete with some of the world's brightest and best commercial pro photographers.

What those photographers all say is that if anyone is worried about copyright theft / image piracy, then don't shove unprotected pictures on the 'Net but watermark 'em in such a way that even the most expensive pixel manipulation software around -- which definitely isn't today's offering from SoftOrbits -- can't defeat it. As to how to do that, you yourself should know. I'm not going to waste space here telling a working photographer / writer / publisher.

The Clone Stamp has been out and in use for Gawd knows how many years -- 20? -- and by now the Internet should be absolutely stuffed full of 1,000s of case histories about the theft of images by unscrupulous users of post-processing software. Adobe should also have gone bust by now under the weight of Class Actions. But the Internet isn't full of such case histories, leading one to conclude that this issue is more an Urban Myth than an actual reality. And no, Adobe hasn't gone bust, either.

I could put an image on the 'Net right now that no-one could pirate using today's Soft Orbits giveaway or, indeed, any combination at all of high-end Adobe products costing $000s (hint: low-res thumbnail icon coupled to low-res mother image embossed with broad-rim circular ripple). The protective effort would take me all of 2 minutes.

I can also right-click on any image I may've posted on the 'Net and call up a TinEye image search and Google image search to determine if anyone has pirated it (though good on them, if they've managed to make anything at all out of a data-stripped picture-minimized lo-res ripple-watermarked original.)

Bottom line: the world isn't full of people going around using this kind of software on other folks's pictures. What it is full of are people who like taking pictures, and would like a way to remove blemishes and unwanted objects from those pictures on their computers back at home.

To imply that somehow, all these people are bonded together in a malevolent conspiracy to rip-off commercial photographers is not only offensive to those who might wish to download and try today's GOATD, it's actually bordering on the paranoid.

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+30)

Jeff most photo editing software can remove a watermark, what software do you use

Reply   |   Comment by Buckoooo  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)

Jeff
Use your watermark then apply your Digimarc
https://www.digimarc.com/

Reply   |   Comment by ME  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-4)

Jeff
Watermark with visible text or logos splashed over the photo may be outdated.
It is still widely used. I see a lot of it in social media photos.
It is mostly used by hobbyists who are afraid others will take their photo and use for commercial purpose without consent.
As far as professional photography is concerned, no need to worry about SoftOrbits Photo Stamp remover Version 7.5. It is only a toy software, at best.

For professional photographers, they may have moved beyond the primitive method of watermarking using visible text or logos splashed over the photo. Nowadays there is digital water marking. It is not free.

Digimarc Digital Watermarking for JPG Images
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ilrEmSrbIU

Digimarc's New Chroma Digital Watermarking Technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdZgDTwEM9Y

Digimarc and Photoshop for Invisible Protection
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K49o9T1LX-k

How To Use Digimarc With Lightroom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EwEj8Z345E

Reply   |   Comment by ric  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)

Jeff
A scan of an old photograph from 1900 that was very heavily blemished because the fixer had not been thoroughly removed. It was from a funeral and all were in black and had to be manually repaired about 15 years ago, it took ages.
Using programs similar to today's would of done an equally good job in a very short time, just because programs are misused does not mean they should not be produced.
The Electric Chair is used in America to carry out the death sentence, should we ban electricity?

Reply   |   Comment by XP-Man  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)

XP-Man Or even, furniture making?

Reply   |   Comment by MikeR  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+4)

ric "For professional photographers, they may have moved beyond the primitive method of watermarking using visible text or logos splashed over the photo. Nowadays there is digital water marking. It is not free. ".
Digimarc is very old allready 1996! and is NOT and never has been the way to "protect" photo's on internet. Some of the problems it never caught on : Yes, NOW you know that someone copied your image, and then what? Track them all, sue them all? In every country around the globe? And, with one screendump your photo can still be copied .... it just does not work. Look at the post of MikeR. a visible logo is the right way to go, but if you do it, do it the right way.

Reply   |   Comment by Lucky Luke  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)
#5

Some examples:
Original:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9say4u5qs5dj9lg/Rode%20ogen01.jpg?dl=0
Operation(two steps):
https://www.dropbox.com/s/k9zqzuwmog8yhua/TongVerwijderen2Stappen.png?dl=0
Result:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6psrnpqw3x33atl/Rode%20ogen01-bewerkt.jpg?dl=0

Original:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2wxkndoondj89se/motor-file.jpg?dl=0
Operation:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/shkuinkigeqk20a/GumXP.png?dl=0
Result:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6jvp8pdjs2fzyv9/motor-file-bewerkt.jpg?dl=0

Original:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xww0s9gffwv5odq/pan3a.jpg?dl=0
Operation:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0hmynkzfqeukdzk/RemoveWin10.png?dl=0
Result after cloning:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/b7s38qgzy5yeai7/pan3a-bewerkt-clone.jpg?dl=0

Original:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/csw80j9xqdkckfz/Vierkanten.png?dl=0
Operation Clone:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fii9pa4vo48fbj8/CloningWin10.png?dl=0
Result:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/knms6xfsp95vwzo/Vierkanten-bewerkt-3.png?dl=0

Reply   |   Comment by Ootje  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+14)
#4

Worked exactly as advertised, I did notice a marginally lower quality in the corrected area but I wasn't particularly careful about where I used the brush and the image I used it on (about 15 seconds in google, used the first image I found). I felt the registration was a bit convoluted and I raised my eyebrows a bit about having to enter my email address on an unfamiliar site, but I unchecked all the subscription boxes so I don't think I'll be getting any spam. New here though, so that may be pretty standard and I'm just being silly.

I do think the price is a bit high for what it does though - I could buy un-watermarked images and sets of images for far less than that, but I suppose extended use of this would end up covering the price eventually.

Keeping, but for me personally it'll probably gather dust because I tend not to run into a lot of obnoxiously watermarked images, and I have photoshop anyway.

Reply   |   Comment by Coffee  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+3)

Coffee
actually I played with some higher res images and I'm seeing a lot of quality issues. For $50, you could easily get photoshop and some sweet, sweet subway sandwiches. Conceptually a good idea, and the program itself is simple but there are a lot of cheaper alternates that result in higher quality so I'll be removing.

Reply   |   Comment by Coffee  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)

Coffee
I'd love to get Photoshop for $50, with or without the subs. :/

Reply   |   Comment by SpacemanSpiff  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+2)

SpacemanSpiff
Isn't CC $10 a month? I got cs6 a while back because I'm not big on subscription fees so I'm not down with the prices

Reply   |   Comment by Coffee  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-2)

Coffee A relatively recent version of Photoshop for $50? Where? I have been hunting on eBay for an inexpensive copy of Photoshop CS6. You'd have to be really lucky to get a legit unused copy for under $100.

Reply   |   Comment by Preston Mitchell  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (0)
#3

Installed and registered fine on XP.

Tested using vector clipart with a watermark. Results not very good.
Before vs. After.

Reply   |   Comment by YossiD  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)
#2

I tried to take the beak off a penguin and got a deformed beak. Irfanview's color picker and eraser does better. So-o-o disappointed. It installed in AppData Win 7 64. Weird, I agree with Xp-Man. Uninstalled without problems.

Reply   |   Comment by david roper  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+8)
#1

Installation had a bit of a surprise, instead of putting itself in Program Files it attempted to put itself in Documents and Settings - User. After that registration was accomplished without any difficulty.

A quick test and it performed well, but it should do at such a high price.
I'll be keeping it, it could be useful, but I wouldn't pay that price for it.

Reply   |   Comment by XP-Man  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+9)

For those like myself who still use XP it installed and ran without difficulty.

Reply   |   Comment by XP-Man  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (-6)

XP-Man
On my virtual XP it installed in %LocalAppData%. That is, in
"C:\Documents and Settings\myusername\Local Settings\Application Data\Photo Stamp Remover\"

On the real W10 in SandboxIE in C:\Program Files (x86)\Photo Stamp Remover.

Reply   |   Comment by krypteller  –  3 years ago  –  Did you find this comment useful? yes | no (+11)
Add a comment

iPhone app giveaways »

Around the World in 80d 2019 Giveaway
A game adaptation of the classic novel.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Videos in Video Giveaway
Fast and easy-to-use video editing application!
$5.99 ➞ free today
Ocmo Giveaway
Ocmo is an award winning ninja rope platformer that challenges even hardcore gamers.
$4.99 ➞ free today
Medieval Rabbit Stickers Giveaway
Specially designed to send to your friends and stick all over your text messages.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Ananda Giveaway
Ananda helps you meditate, focus and relax with progressive binaural tones and high quality peaceful sounds.
$2.99 ➞ free today

Android app giveaways »

Ai. Gallery Giveaway
Ai Gallery is a beautiful and efficient offline photo & video gallery.
$4.99 ➞ free today
FoxyLand | Premium Giveaway
Are you willing to do anything to give a million cherries, collect all the jewels and even save your favorite?
$1.99 ➞ free today
Freebloks VIP Giveaway
This is the Android version of Freebloks 3D, an implementation of the famous board game Blokus.
$2.99 ➞ free today
FarmAR Giveaway
FarmAR is an exciting Augmented Reality Farm Experience, allowing you to create your own farm in the world around you.
$0.99 ➞ free today
Auto Optimizer Giveaway
Auto optimize your device to keep it functional!
$2.49 ➞ free today