Every day we offer FREE licensed software you’d have to buy otherwise.
Batch Image Enhancer Professional was available as a giveaway on August 3, 2019!
Enhance your photos with awesome effects!
Fix exposure, adjust contrast, remove noise, sharpen, etc. Add dynamic text & picture watermarks. Work with face recognition algorithms. Apply various actions, filters, and effects to your pictures.
Features:
Please note: the license is provided for 3 years.
Windows XP/ Vista/ 7/ 8/ 8.1/ 10
8.3 MB
$29.99
QUESTION??? How Do You Batch Enhance??? Doesn't make sense to me?!!
Save | Cancel
Estou tentando baixar o Programa e não abre a pagina, ja e a 3ª vez que isto esta acontecendo seguida comigo, abre a pagina mais na hora de baixar nada a pigina fica estatica e não vai para lugar nenhum, queria informar e saber se e algum problema, fico no aguardo,Obrigado.
Save | Cancel
Every photo I have is a unique, every photo editor I have can do all of those adjustments and more.
How do you tell this photo enhancer in a batch mode to re-adjust every photo with different settings, you can not, most of the photos will be ruined if one setup applied to all of the photos.
To me it would be useless, but for someone, may be beneficial.
Save | Cancel
Gordon,
"Every photo I have is a unique ... most of the photos will be ruined if one setup applied to all of the photos."
Often people think of batch processing images as something that someone selling online would use preparing their product images, & while that is true, it's more common otherwise than many might think. Somewhat higher end apps like Lightroom or ON1 RAW etc. all let you save presets & easily apply those to many photos, whether you're going for a signature look for a series or enhancing photos from a single shoot. That doesn't mean processing has to stop there -- it might just get a lot of stuff efficiently out of the way, so that you can focus just on the individualized tweaks to make a good photo great.
Batch Image Enhancer Pro is more involved, with the ability to set conditions, action sequences etc. in a somewhat script-like format. I'm in the process of scanning thousands of old prints, focusing much more on just getting it done rather than making each one a masterpiece, and for that the more limited Photolemur works well, although I have had to process some badly faded batches separately in a more capable app. Engelmann has a couple of batch processing apps that have more features than Photolemur [though not as many as Batch Image Enhancer Pro], but getting the images through Photolemur is faster, which is why I use it. While many of the filters [actions] in Batch Image Enhancer Pro are gimmicky, it does have roughly a dozen that might work on with those faded photos, so I'm giving it a try, but I don't think it'll cause me to abandon processing RAW photos in Lightroom -> Photoshop.
Save | Cancel
Gordon, you are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! There is no way this app can make all your photos correct. I have better programs that I trust before I would use this one. Thanks anyways.
Save | Cancel
Obviously if anyone is getting some prompt to "upgrade" they haven't properly registered the program. I guess this is to be expected when you open up giveaways to the general, unreasonable population.
Save | Cancel
Thank you for something, I am not sure as to what this software is designed to do. Perhaps an uninstall in in order at this point. I am missing the point as to why I need this. Photo pos Pro is free and it has all this plus a thousand more available options Seriously I can't understand what this is designed to improve in a photo
Save | Cancel
Recommending a lightweight alternative that is really connected to a premium PAY program? Getting tired of this nonsense! No thanks! I'll stick with the free FULL program offered here today!
Save | Cancel
John Smith,
If you think this is a full program you are a fool.
Reason being that in order to get a full program one needs to upgrade the "Professional" version offered here.
Save | Cancel
I find that photos often need different degrees of enhancement so I'm not so sure that batch enhancing will give particularly good results all round.
I will give it a miss.
Save | Cancel
Niv,
Lots of folks aren't into heavily editing their photos because it takes a bit of time, so batch processing is a middle ground, where you can make them look better without spending all day on it. OTOH, most every photo can benefit from adjusting levels for example, so you can use Batch Image Enhancer Pro to do that sort of thing more quickly than is possible when editing each one individually, and that can save you time, since you can focus only on the individual tweaks you want while you're in that photo editor.
Save | Cancel
Does this got deblur feature?
Thank youi
Save | Cancel
Ari, asking question and getting negative marking -1
Save | Cancel
TK, No, when I had asked the question there wasn't such reply as you mentioned. But I appreciate your reply which is helpful to understand my above question.
Save | Cancel
TK,
"Sharpen" is not the same as "deblur" and a good image processing program will treat each differently. "Deblur" applies to the overall image the same, and "sharpen" applies to edges differently than it does to the overall image.
You can find research online to learn more. Yao Wang, Ph.D. at Polytech Institute of New York has done some indepth study of the differences.
Even though the program may list "Sharpen" as a feature, it does not mean that it also does deblur. Most users may be satisfied with a sharpen feature, but when comparing the same image with both methods applied to two different resultant images, only then will the difference be apparent enough to realize that sharpen does not solve all images.
Save | Cancel
Basically, you need to pay to upgrade to do anything useful with this software.
Save | Cancel
3 years license, is absolutely fare and generous offer.
Not link others with 3-6 months trials.
Thumbs up.
Save | Cancel
Nektar, 3 years is fair, but it appears to be giving plenty time to UPGRADE based on following comments.
Save | Cancel
Allen Shoudy, thank you for the remark, I admit I had not tested this.
(Thanks also for correcting my bad English)
Save | Cancel