<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[uMark Professional 1.3 comments:]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/</link>
<description><![CDATA[free licensed software daily]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>FeedWriter</generator>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Kantruole]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76815</link>
<description><![CDATA[i need help because i can't to delete this program from my computer.who knows help me please.thanks]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:15:53 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76815</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kantruole]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Sandra Freeman]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76814</link>
<description><![CDATA[Easy to use and makes very attractive watermarks on my photos.  Thanks GAOTD!]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:12:25 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76814</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Freeman]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Marcel Wave]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76813</link>
<description><![CDATA[I'm surprised that this is the "Professional" version - how basic is the standard?  

In my view the programme would be infinitely improved if it gave the user the ability to resize the watermark image file relative to the base file.  As it stands, it doesn't - leading to endless faff with seperate graphics utilities in order to get the desired proportions.  What a hassle.  Further, if batch editing it would be useful to set a common ratio for the watermark size relative to the base file size, so the output is uniform even if the base file image varies in size.  You can currently do neither, so for this reason the prog seems neither professional nor useful I'm afraid.  Perhaps the publishers might add these features in future releases?  If they did, they'd have a winner!]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:50:55 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76813</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcel Wave]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Angie]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76812</link>
<description><![CDATA[I downloaded this program. I have Vista Home Basic, 32 bit OS. It installed fine, registered fine, and is so SIMPLE to use! I am an amateur photographer, and I often make wallpapers to give away for free, using my own images. It used to a bit of time to mark them because I had to do it in paint shop pro. But on first run, you are asked if you want to add watermarking to your windows explorer context menu. Click "yes", and then you can right click on any image you have, and then left click on "Watermark". The picture then opens in the program, it takes about 2 seconds to mark it, and you're done. 

This is the first time I have ever used a watermarking program, so it's not like I am an old pro or something. 

When the program is open, click start, then next on each screen, then finish, only filling in the parts you want. For example, I put text on one picture and left logo and everything blank. It's sooooooo simple!

Also, it gives you the options of choosing different folders to put the images in, and even changing the image's name.

I love it :)]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:04:18 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76812</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angie]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Harry]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76811</link>
<description><![CDATA[The purpose of watermarking is not only to place a copyright notice on the image, but also to destroy it. It normally goes together with other destructive measures, like lower resolution. That way a web site can display a version of the image that's for sale without fearing that it will be stolen.
There is no way to undo these effects, if done correctly. Any other claim is like saying that one can repaint a Rembrandt after it was destroyed to be identical to the original.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:48:12 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76811</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Joe]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76810</link>
<description><![CDATA[Why are there 2 setup files, are both needed to install this program?
Kinda confusing!
Will some-one clear me up on that?]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:13:43 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76810</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Abhinav]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76809</link>
<description><![CDATA[I mean come on man, why would I simply not use Gimp Or even Ms Paint?]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:27:02 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76809</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abhinav]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: ocsurfer]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76808</link>
<description><![CDATA[To #55
Not necessarily true, sorry. There are more then one type of watermark out there. Some are micro watermarks over the entire image, some are hidden within the image, some are done via stenography. Many of these other types can NOT be removed without caused massive damage to the watermarked image and others can not be removed at all. Some even allow the image to be searchable so you can bust the thieves, hehe :).

Also, if you take other preventive measures like only posting highly compressed, low resolution, and watermarked images, it will make the image pretty much worthless to a thief. :).]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:39:32 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76808</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ocsurfer]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: George]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76807</link>
<description><![CDATA[The only thing that I don't like with this program is if you make a png watermark image for the transparency in which the program don't support png images for the watermark. Besides that great little program.

Installed great, Works great. Vista Home SP1]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:38:39 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76807</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: PuterMan]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76806</link>
<description><![CDATA[#15 BoRegard: There are many many programs out there now needed some version of .NET - That is hardly an issue!

#34 John: Now would that be a machine that is running some dodgy Microsoft operating system then? Get a life really, or go play with Ubuntu.

#40 Cy: Well yes it was a good thing to do if you don't want the software.

#44 Jim Baird: Because it is written in one of the Visual Studio suite - C#, VB - and therefore requires the .NET framework to run just as the old VB programs required the VB runtime.

And to those who think removing watermarks is easy, it depends on where the watermark is placed, it's transparency and size. Some can be very difficult to find, let alone erase.

Incidentally the two versions, setup.exe and setup.msi. Why two? Well if you know you have .NET Framework 2.0 you can use the .msi version. If you are not sure use the .exe version. Setup.exe checks for the .NET framework version and downloads and instals it if you don't have it. The .msi version just installs the progam without any checking.

The program loaded no problems, activated and ran all OK. (XP Home SP3) It is quick and seems a good bargain at nil $, £, Yen etc.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:08:36 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/umark-professional-13/#comment-76806</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PuterMan]]></dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>