<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Ultima Steganography comments:]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/</link>
<description><![CDATA[free licensed software daily]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>FeedWriter</generator>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Fubar]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120144</link>
<description><![CDATA[Updating my comment #19, just like I said, Enplase has a terrible reputation for code quality.  I've verified the complaints, use .zip archives for executables, .doc, etc.  Ultima Steganography also doesn't set the keyboard focus for some fields, which is annoying.

I doubt that Ultima Steganography hides the fact that there's other data all that well, because of the Description.

The photograph which you select should be your own unpublished photo, otherwise a comparison with the original will reveal the presence of probable hidden data.

#28, mike, makes a couple of valid points.  Any lossless operation can be performed on the output images, such as running PNG files through OptiPNG, etc.  Also, steganography encompasses much more than just images.

The open-source <a href="http://anl.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">Adaptive Steganography with AES</a> is probably a good implementation, but it hasn't been ported to Windows and it's not under development.  The open-source <a href="http://steghide.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">Steghide</a> is very old.  The open-source <a href="http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/steganography/mp3stego/" rel="nofollow">MP3Stego</a> has some problems, isn't under development, and probably doesn't do a great of hiding the fact that there's concealed data.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:43:36 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120144</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fubar]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Benjamin]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120143</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is a pretty sweet piece of software. I could see myself paying for a program like this but $30 seems a little steep. I played with the program a bit and got it to work for some file types but I am having trouble extracting .doc and .docx files. Anyone else having issues with extracting these types of files?]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120143</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Ruth]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120142</link>
<description><![CDATA[What is the reason for this really? Some examples? Can this hide a long file name and at a glance of hovering over the picture, will it reveal what's in your file? Or is this just attaching a zipped or RAR file? Will this go through online data backup systems, to be downloaded back to be still in tact and unencryptable? At least tell of some uses, if anyone knows.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:01:03 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120142</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruth]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: MichaelC]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120141</link>
<description><![CDATA[Very cool !!!  Quickly hid a poem in a picture of a big cat's face &amp; eyes (a lion, maybe it is, not sure), then just as quickly extracted it, using a password.  No problems.  Then used a larger picture and was able to hide a larger document, this time using no password.  Again, no problems.

Checking Properties in IrfanView did reveal a slight discrepancy between the processed picture's size on disk and its current memory size.  Windows standard Properties also shows a very slight difference in size.  I suppose this could be a clue that the photo has, as they say, <i>more to it than meets the eye</i>.

<b>Suggestion</b>:  The input box where one chooses a name for the output file only accepts full paths (this is filled in when one chooses "Browse" and then inputs a name.  Clarification here is needed; perhaps an Options category to set the default output path once, then all created files would go to the default unless another path is manually chosen.

<b>Another suggestion</b>:  Not everyone will like the way the program windows "zoom in" on them; it is disconcerting -- change this to a more standard window opening.

I like the way the program immediately tells you your maximum embedded file size, based on the picture you select.

Quick and easy to use.  Thank-you GOTD and Enplase Research.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:16:46 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120141</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelC]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Robin J]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120140</link>
<description><![CDATA[I installed this on win xpsp3. Installed very nicely. No problems with the install. 
Activated the software with ease. Also ran the software and had NO problems at all. 
Thanks, GAOTD for a nice software offer once again. 

I also wanted to thank everyone that comments on here, It can really help me at times with some questions I may have with other software. And thank you GAOTD for allowing us to give feedback. It sure can be helpful to me and I am sure many others sometimes. Thanks everyone. Have a great day. 

Robin]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:38:08 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120140</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin J]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Keter]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120139</link>
<description><![CDATA[Installed, registered and ran perfectly on Win7 x64.  Had no trouble figuring out the interface, which does not need to be complicated.  Created a test with a low resolution .jpg photo and rather large .txt file (not zipped).  Output looked good, but the output picture was noticeably brighter.  File recovered quickly without any loss.  I like this as I do have some confidential client notes as text files that would be great to stow away for an added layer of protection.  Put several suggestions into the suggestion box for the developer.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:52:38 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120139</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keter]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: George]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120138</link>
<description><![CDATA[#19 Fubar makes a good comments,follow his link to steganography.
The user rating 63% to 37% shows positive views of a tool that works.
It's good to keep it simple, watertight and inconspicuous.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:53:37 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120138</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Inas is stupid]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120137</link>
<description><![CDATA[--------------
CONS: * If user forgets chosen key/password, encrypted file is unrecoverable.
--------------

How can that be a negative thing? A encrypted file will always be "unrecoverable" without a password. If it isn't unrecoverable then it's encrypted in a bad way.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:48:51 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120137</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inas is stupid]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Soulflare3]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120136</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nice, Simple, Easy to use interface. Very nice piece of software. Great job!]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:21:58 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120136</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soulflare3]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: himagain]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120135</link>
<description><![CDATA[To non-geeks:
People, the need for personal security increases daily. Not just from identity theft, but politically. EVERYTHING you pass over the 'Net is probably being captured - and not just by "criminals".
Within 2 years the 'Net WILL be controlled.
If you haven't read the book "1984" by Orwell, you should as a matter of family future concern.
The technology to track you and your activities available right now is only what we already know about. Who knows what is out there and next? 

The two words "privacy" and "security" are the same thing today. 
BE CAREFUL OUT "THERE"....]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:08:58 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ultima-steganography/#comment-120135</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[himagain]]></dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>