<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>TweakRAM 6.1Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/</link>
	<description>free licensed software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:27:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KenM</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65757</link>
		<dc:creator>KenM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65757</guid>
		<description>While the program can&#039;t work miracles, I love it.  My work machine has only 512Mb, and I leave it on for week (I regularly have about 10-15 tasks open at a time (some of them browsers, with 3 or 4 tabs), so opening that all up every morning would just be a pain.)  The problem is that, by the end of the week, everything is very slow, and I often have to re-boot during the week.

I now keep this program minimised, and glance periodically at that meter.  When it drops too low, I quickly run it, and it helps - a lot.  It&#039;s probably too soon to tell, but so far, my machine certainly operates much better than it has in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the program can&#8217;t work miracles, I love it.  My work machine has only 512Mb, and I leave it on for week (I regularly have about 10-15 tasks open at a time (some of them browsers, with 3 or 4 tabs), so opening that all up every morning would just be a pain.)  The problem is that, by the end of the week, everything is very slow, and I often have to re-boot during the week.</p>
<p>I now keep this program minimised, and glance periodically at that meter.  When it drops too low, I quickly run it, and it helps &#8211; a lot.  It&#8217;s probably too soon to tell, but so far, my machine certainly operates much better than it has in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totya</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65646</link>
		<dc:creator>Totya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65646</guid>
		<description>I downloaded, and tried this, but i didn&#039;t see any difference... I have 1GB Ram in my laptop, and Windows defaultly use about 460MB, this program didn&#039;t unload any dll, modul, etc. It is shiny and decorativ, but useless...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded, and tried this, but i didn&#8217;t see any difference&#8230; I have 1GB Ram in my laptop, and Windows defaultly use about 460MB, this program didn&#8217;t unload any dll, modul, etc. It is shiny and decorativ, but useless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65484</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65484</guid>
		<description>momory optimizers are a joke, read here it&#039;s all explained why:

http://88.191.26.34/computers_are_fun/2007/04/24/do-i-need-a-memory-optimizer/

and it also feature a little soft that different but help using your ram better. but using it, as it explains good ram is used ram!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>momory optimizers are a joke, read here it&#8217;s all explained why:</p>
<p><a href="http://88.191.26.34/computers_are_fun/2007/04/24/do-i-need-a-memory-optimizer/" rel="nofollow">http://88.191.26.34/computers_are_fun/2007/04/24/do-i-need-a-memory-optimizer/</a></p>
<p>and it also feature a little soft that different but help using your ram better. but using it, as it explains good ram is used ram!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65350</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65350</guid>
		<description>These apps are useless. The built-in XP memory manager does an excellent job without leaving &quot;holes&quot; or other mythical bottlenecks. Constantly flushing your cache actually creates more disk access. Stay away from this kind of stuff ... it never delivers what it advertises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These apps are useless. The built-in XP memory manager does an excellent job without leaving &#8220;holes&#8221; or other mythical bottlenecks. Constantly flushing your cache actually creates more disk access. Stay away from this kind of stuff &#8230; it never delivers what it advertises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackflag</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65341</link>
		<dc:creator>blackflag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65341</guid>
		<description>This program sounds like a good one but I will have to pass on it.. 

Memory optimizers only work in some cases.

Limiting the amount of useless programs installed is a better way of keeping your ram and processor free. 

This pick has no affect on how great I think the crew at GAOTD is..
GAOTD is still the best.. 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This program sounds like a good one but I will have to pass on it.. </p>
<p>Memory optimizers only work in some cases.</p>
<p>Limiting the amount of useless programs installed is a better way of keeping your ram and processor free. </p>
<p>This pick has no affect on how great I think the crew at GAOTD is..<br />
GAOTD is still the best.. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hempman</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65330</link>
		<dc:creator>Hempman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65330</guid>
		<description>I forgot to report:

I normally use no mmemory optimizer on Win XP Pro. This particular machine has only 512 MB RAM, AMD 64 3600 CPU. I am running 44 processes including: IE 7 with five tabs open and Windows Live toolbar loaded with a crapload of buttons, Windows Live Messenger, K9 Anti-spam, AVG AV and anti-spyware, iobi Home (a service that gives my &#039;puter control over my phone service), a biometric device control program, ATI Control Center, Gigabyte Tech Sound Manager (for my Dolby Surround Sound), the Task Manager and a bunch of services for all the above.

While my RAM reports most of my RAM is in use, My CPU load floats around 4% on idle, and up to a whopping 8% when I start typing (it drops to 0% very frequently, and the 8% is the normal peak with spikes up to 15%.

As I edit this, I open a new IE7 Window, RAM useage barely moves, CPU spikes to 94% for about one second, and IE 7 is open completely within four seconds.

I ran TwaekRAM earlier, using the exact same test. RAM was cleared, sure. For about thirty seconds. CPU useage floated around 30%, jumping up around 40% when I start typing. The same test loading IE7 with all that other stuff above took ten seconds to load a second window for IE7, with TweakRAM running.

Now, exactly how is TweakRAM making my system more efficient?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to report:</p>
<p>I normally use no mmemory optimizer on Win XP Pro. This particular machine has only 512 MB RAM, AMD 64 3600 CPU. I am running 44 processes including: IE 7 with five tabs open and Windows Live toolbar loaded with a crapload of buttons, Windows Live Messenger, K9 Anti-spam, AVG AV and anti-spyware, iobi Home (a service that gives my &#8216;puter control over my phone service), a biometric device control program, ATI Control Center, Gigabyte Tech Sound Manager (for my Dolby Surround Sound), the Task Manager and a bunch of services for all the above.</p>
<p>While my RAM reports most of my RAM is in use, My CPU load floats around 4% on idle, and up to a whopping 8% when I start typing (it drops to 0% very frequently, and the 8% is the normal peak with spikes up to 15%.</p>
<p>As I edit this, I open a new IE7 Window, RAM useage barely moves, CPU spikes to 94% for about one second, and IE 7 is open completely within four seconds.</p>
<p>I ran TwaekRAM earlier, using the exact same test. RAM was cleared, sure. For about thirty seconds. CPU useage floated around 30%, jumping up around 40% when I start typing. The same test loading IE7 with all that other stuff above took ten seconds to load a second window for IE7, with TweakRAM running.</p>
<p>Now, exactly how is TweakRAM making my system more efficient?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hempman</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65327</link>
		<dc:creator>Hempman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65327</guid>
		<description>A waste of time. Memory optimization has not been needed since Win 95. If you get a speed boost, then your system is kludged up. Probably from installing memory resident junk like memory optimzers.

It&#039;s been a great experiment, trying to give away free software. I think that horse has broken its leg beyond repair. Time to get out that old revolver and put the poor thing out of its memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A waste of time. Memory optimization has not been needed since Win 95. If you get a speed boost, then your system is kludged up. Probably from installing memory resident junk like memory optimzers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a great experiment, trying to give away free software. I think that horse has broken its leg beyond repair. Time to get out that old revolver and put the poor thing out of its memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paradoxicles</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65313</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradoxicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65313</guid>
		<description>I actually have been recently thinking that I need to get a memory flushing program. I have to work with some pages on a regular basis that are loaded with poorly written javascript. Kicking that crud out of memory can make a big difference (on my Win98 and Millenium Machines).

I used to use a freeware program put out by MSI (they make motherboards etc.) which I was really happy with. It was pretty simple, nothing fancy and rock solid stable (and of course it worked). Along time before that I had used another one that I cant remember the name of. I couldn&#039;t find the one by MSI, when I looked just a couple of weeks ago. I&#039;d be really interested in hearing about the freeware alternatives that some of you are using. 

I do have Machines with XP as well (which don&#039;t need a program like this) but I still like using Win9x, and I have one with 2GB of memory that gets full of junk sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have been recently thinking that I need to get a memory flushing program. I have to work with some pages on a regular basis that are loaded with poorly written javascript. Kicking that crud out of memory can make a big difference (on my Win98 and Millenium Machines).</p>
<p>I used to use a freeware program put out by MSI (they make motherboards etc.) which I was really happy with. It was pretty simple, nothing fancy and rock solid stable (and of course it worked). Along time before that I had used another one that I cant remember the name of. I couldn&#8217;t find the one by MSI, when I looked just a couple of weeks ago. I&#8217;d be really interested in hearing about the freeware alternatives that some of you are using. </p>
<p>I do have Machines with XP as well (which don&#8217;t need a program like this) but I still like using Win9x, and I have one with 2GB of memory that gets full of junk sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65312</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65312</guid>
		<description>Try Maxmem from Analogx.com.  It&#039;s freeware, simple and works well.  I first tried maxmem on my slow computers for ocassional use 5 or 7 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Maxmem from Analogx.com.  It&#8217;s freeware, simple and works well.  I first tried maxmem on my slow computers for ocassional use 5 or 7 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downside Up</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/comment-page-3/#comment-65310</link>
		<dc:creator>Downside Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/tweakram-61/#comment-65310</guid>
		<description>Already downloaded this the previous time it was offered. The only real use for me is when I want to free up memory for other programmes/games (after unloading all the memory resident utilities in the system tray) or to get rid of stuff remaining in memory after a program crash. It sometimes works. I usually run it a couple of times in a row the get some results. Then I lose it.

Thanks kalmanizer (#56). TZ Connection Booster did a great job for me. Better than TCP Optimizer. Good suggestion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already downloaded this the previous time it was offered. The only real use for me is when I want to free up memory for other programmes/games (after unloading all the memory resident utilities in the system tray) or to get rid of stuff remaining in memory after a program crash. It sometimes works. I usually run it a couple of times in a row the get some results. Then I lose it.</p>
<p>Thanks kalmanizer (#56). TZ Connection Booster did a great job for me. Better than TCP Optimizer. Good suggestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.278 seconds -->
