<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>ScanittoComments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/</link>
	<description>free licensed software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:31:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-70511</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-70511</guid>
		<description>I downloaded the FreeScanner pgm that someone suggested, but the instructions are in French. Is there a way to get the English version of the pgm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded the FreeScanner pgm that someone suggested, but the instructions are in French. Is there a way to get the English version of the pgm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-70510</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-70510</guid>
		<description>I downloaded the FreeScanner program someone suggested, but the installation instructions are in French. Is there a way to get the English version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded the FreeScanner program someone suggested, but the installation instructions are in French. Is there a way to get the English version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-70188</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-70188</guid>
		<description>New version with bugfixes released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.masterslabs.com/dpwnload/scanitto/scanitto.exe&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Download&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New version with bugfixes released <a href="http://www.masterslabs.com/dpwnload/scanitto/scanitto.exe" title="" rel="nofollow">Download</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: germu</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69775</link>
		<dc:creator>germu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69775</guid>
		<description>your kidding, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your kidding, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SG</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69772</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69772</guid>
		<description>UncleDoodie, what is the best Canon scanner under $100-$150?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UncleDoodie, what is the best Canon scanner under $100-$150?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hempman</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69768</link>
		<dc:creator>Hempman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69768</guid>
		<description>While cross format conversion is very common, it is very important to note that once one converts from RAW, there is absolutely no way to restore important original photo data that was lost in the conversion. In fact, just as important original photo data is lost when converting away from RAW, even more data is lost when converting from PNG or BMP to any other format that can never be recovered.

Furthermore, when converting to lossy formats such as highly compressed GIF or JPG formats, not only is significant data permanently lost, but artifacts that reduce the overall value of the photo are introduced that can simply not be removed.

Despite what you may have been told, TIF is the best format for archiving documents and RAW is the very best photographic format.

TIF is the format prefered by the Smithsonian Institution for preserving digital copies of documents. At 16 bits, Tiff files are lossless. That means none of the original color, saturation or other data is lost. Tiff files can be compressed as much as any jpg without losing any photo data and without any loss of photo detail. There will also never be any introduction of moire or other artifacts, as there is with jog and even BMP and PNG.

RAW is the format prefered for perserving the most data about photographs as it is also lossless and preserves data that no other format even knows about such as white balance, color depth, etc. RAW format has 12 bits and has a color depth of 4096 intensities for each pixel. JPG at 8 bits has only 256 intensities for each pixel (and remember, due to the lossy nature of jpg, depending on how much compression is used, there are actually fewer (sometimes significantly fewer) unique pixels to begin with as compared with RAW or TIF).

If you lack the skill to know the difference, or you think that JPG is good enough for your photos, then saving as a JPG is certainly good enough for you.

The only disadvantage to RAW files is that they have to be converted to TIF or JPG to print them, unless you are particularly well off and can afford a printer that handles RAW format. The other main disadvantage with RAW format is that they take up alot of space. That means you can store fewer pics. 

Other formats are OK for the snapshot/amateur crowd, but pros prefer RAW or TIFF.

That brings me to my analysis of the tif format as implements in Scanitto. While I have recommended TIF format, I am refering to 16 bit TIF. Scanitto only produces lossy 8 bit TIF files. Not archival. Purely amateur software for those too lazy to find the right drivers and software for thier scanners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While cross format conversion is very common, it is very important to note that once one converts from RAW, there is absolutely no way to restore important original photo data that was lost in the conversion. In fact, just as important original photo data is lost when converting away from RAW, even more data is lost when converting from PNG or BMP to any other format that can never be recovered.</p>
<p>Furthermore, when converting to lossy formats such as highly compressed GIF or JPG formats, not only is significant data permanently lost, but artifacts that reduce the overall value of the photo are introduced that can simply not be removed.</p>
<p>Despite what you may have been told, TIF is the best format for archiving documents and RAW is the very best photographic format.</p>
<p>TIF is the format prefered by the Smithsonian Institution for preserving digital copies of documents. At 16 bits, Tiff files are lossless. That means none of the original color, saturation or other data is lost. Tiff files can be compressed as much as any jpg without losing any photo data and without any loss of photo detail. There will also never be any introduction of moire or other artifacts, as there is with jog and even BMP and PNG.</p>
<p>RAW is the format prefered for perserving the most data about photographs as it is also lossless and preserves data that no other format even knows about such as white balance, color depth, etc. RAW format has 12 bits and has a color depth of 4096 intensities for each pixel. JPG at 8 bits has only 256 intensities for each pixel (and remember, due to the lossy nature of jpg, depending on how much compression is used, there are actually fewer (sometimes significantly fewer) unique pixels to begin with as compared with RAW or TIF).</p>
<p>If you lack the skill to know the difference, or you think that JPG is good enough for your photos, then saving as a JPG is certainly good enough for you.</p>
<p>The only disadvantage to RAW files is that they have to be converted to TIF or JPG to print them, unless you are particularly well off and can afford a printer that handles RAW format. The other main disadvantage with RAW format is that they take up alot of space. That means you can store fewer pics. </p>
<p>Other formats are OK for the snapshot/amateur crowd, but pros prefer RAW or TIFF.</p>
<p>That brings me to my analysis of the tif format as implements in Scanitto. While I have recommended TIF format, I am refering to 16 bit TIF. Scanitto only produces lossy 8 bit TIF files. Not archival. Purely amateur software for those too lazy to find the right drivers and software for thier scanners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBee</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69764</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69764</guid>
		<description>I was a photo editor for a .com and we used the scanner a lot, we had bot a Cannon and a HP and bot worked fine.  As another said that the software that comes on the CD, which most of us never use, usually contains some pretty good software.  I was impredded with a program that came with one of the copier/scanner purchases I made in the last 10 years.  The program is ACDSee, I reccomend this to all who take images and want to compress them, text or photo.  The superior part of this program is the dithering it does upon compression which can be set to a airbrushed look.  Thanks GOTD for putting Star Burn up again, that program is nearly worth 4 stars!  I haven&#039;t got a Blu-Ray yet, but the ability to create easily ISO images that mount as if they were a disk is great!  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a photo editor for a .com and we used the scanner a lot, we had bot a Cannon and a HP and bot worked fine.  As another said that the software that comes on the CD, which most of us never use, usually contains some pretty good software.  I was impredded with a program that came with one of the copier/scanner purchases I made in the last 10 years.  The program is ACDSee, I reccomend this to all who take images and want to compress them, text or photo.  The superior part of this program is the dithering it does upon compression which can be set to a airbrushed look.  Thanks GOTD for putting Star Burn up again, that program is nearly worth 4 stars!  I haven&#8217;t got a Blu-Ray yet, but the ability to create easily ISO images that mount as if they were a disk is great!  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soloact</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69762</link>
		<dc:creator>Soloact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69762</guid>
		<description>Maybe this will get my old scanner up and working again, as it was not compatible when MS upgraded their OS from 9x to XP. As far as formats, it really doesn&#039;t matter as image formats can be easily converted nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this will get my old scanner up and working again, as it was not compatible when MS upgraded their OS from 9x to XP. As far as formats, it really doesn&#8217;t matter as image formats can be easily converted nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Das Ünheiligein</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69761</link>
		<dc:creator>Das Ünheiligein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69761</guid>
		<description>Post #2 is right, every scanner comes with its own software and if not, almost all photoshop programs can do this. can you please post something more usefull gotd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post #2 is right, every scanner comes with its own software and if not, almost all photoshop programs can do this. can you please post something more usefull gotd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hempman</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/comment-page-1/#comment-69747</link>
		<dc:creator>Hempman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/scanitto/#comment-69747</guid>
		<description>Antique software. Any $20 scanner comes with better software. Even old scanners have free software available from the manufacturer that does more than this, and better. If you have any MS Office Suite, there is a set of programs called Microsoft Office Document Imaging and Document Scanning that includes a very comprehensive scan and file system as well as OCR (Optical Character Recognition) that literally &quot;reads&quot; the scanned document and makes a .doc out of it.

If you have any decent graphics editor, it probably already has pic scanning built in.

As for this program, it does not play well with other scanner software. It even caused problems with both MS Office programs mentioned, and also caused problems with Corel programs with scanning capabilities.

After installing this Scanitto junk software every other program reported that the scanner was jammed (although it was not - removing this junk returned all functionality to the other programs).

Could not tell you if it is any good, I never got it to work in the first five minutes. And, it is clearly not worth investing any further time.


Some tips for scanning:

If you are going to send a document as a fax DOC, save as multipage tiff. TIF is best for any document as it contains the most information for document archive purposes. If you just want to knock something out, any format will do. However, for document archival purposes TIF is best.

If you have a high quality image, save it in the RAW format. That is one of the greatest problems with Scannito (after the apparent fact that it fights other software): it does not save in any RAW format, as does Canon and HP software. 

RAW files are a little large, but you retain the ability to directly edit white balance, black balance and other important photographic data that gets lost in any other format (including PNG and BMP, but particularly GIF and JPG or any other compressed format). Many amateurs make the mistake of saving thier important pics in another format like PNG or BMP thinking that those formats save this important information, but RAW is the only format that saves all photo data and is always the best for photo editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antique software. Any $20 scanner comes with better software. Even old scanners have free software available from the manufacturer that does more than this, and better. If you have any MS Office Suite, there is a set of programs called Microsoft Office Document Imaging and Document Scanning that includes a very comprehensive scan and file system as well as OCR (Optical Character Recognition) that literally &#8220;reads&#8221; the scanned document and makes a .doc out of it.</p>
<p>If you have any decent graphics editor, it probably already has pic scanning built in.</p>
<p>As for this program, it does not play well with other scanner software. It even caused problems with both MS Office programs mentioned, and also caused problems with Corel programs with scanning capabilities.</p>
<p>After installing this Scanitto junk software every other program reported that the scanner was jammed (although it was not &#8211; removing this junk returned all functionality to the other programs).</p>
<p>Could not tell you if it is any good, I never got it to work in the first five minutes. And, it is clearly not worth investing any further time.</p>
<p>Some tips for scanning:</p>
<p>If you are going to send a document as a fax DOC, save as multipage tiff. TIF is best for any document as it contains the most information for document archive purposes. If you just want to knock something out, any format will do. However, for document archival purposes TIF is best.</p>
<p>If you have a high quality image, save it in the RAW format. That is one of the greatest problems with Scannito (after the apparent fact that it fights other software): it does not save in any RAW format, as does Canon and HP software. </p>
<p>RAW files are a little large, but you retain the ability to directly edit white balance, black balance and other important photographic data that gets lost in any other format (including PNG and BMP, but particularly GIF and JPG or any other compressed format). Many amateurs make the mistake of saving thier important pics in another format like PNG or BMP thinking that those formats save this important information, but RAW is the only format that saves all photo data and is always the best for photo editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.278 seconds -->
