<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Registry Easy - is an excellent Windows Registry Cleaner that easily scans your PC and safely cleans errors &#038; invalid entries.Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/</link>
	<description>free licensed software daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:10:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenM</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-60763</link>
		<dc:creator>KenM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-60763</guid>
		<description>One of the things that happened after I ran this was that my &quot;Recently used file list&quot; in Word was reset to 4.  I ran this on three machines, and only saw this happen on one machine, so it&#039;s not a major problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that happened after I ran this was that my &#8220;Recently used file list&#8221; in Word was reset to 4.  I ran this on three machines, and only saw this happen on one machine, so it&#8217;s not a major problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some guy</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-60191</link>
		<dc:creator>some guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-60191</guid>
		<description>kinda useful, i kinda like it and it scan fast too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kinda useful, i kinda like it and it scan fast too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bostongypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59900</link>
		<dc:creator>Bostongypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59900</guid>
		<description>Looked like it might be useful but gets stuck while scanning Active X.  Since there is no way indicated to stop or pause mid scan to repair problems to date, I have to stop the program. Abort will mot function so I have to close the program.  Seemed to work ok on remainder of scans, however, multiple runs of remainder scans produced same or similar errors which leads me to think perhaps the program does not fix problems found or creates them to look functional.  I not really tech enough to dig into what&#039;s really happening.  I&#039;ll be uninstalling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked like it might be useful but gets stuck while scanning Active X.  Since there is no way indicated to stop or pause mid scan to repair problems to date, I have to stop the program. Abort will mot function so I have to close the program.  Seemed to work ok on remainder of scans, however, multiple runs of remainder scans produced same or similar errors which leads me to think perhaps the program does not fix problems found or creates them to look functional.  I not really tech enough to dig into what&#8217;s really happening.  I&#8217;ll be uninstalling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcs3295</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59646</link>
		<dc:creator>kcs3295</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59646</guid>
		<description>To #133;

It is a rather dangerous procedure to run a registry cleaner more than 1 time consecutively. I would suggest to anyone to run only one time and close the program as this is where people crash their pcs.
Of course understanding what you are removing is critical - see #130.

Then after running other programs and web surfing in a day and I suggest more than 1 day or hours of surfing, run the program again. You could wipe registry entries and other files that may be needed by other programs like shared files (related) which doesn&#039;t make sense I know - but windows is a rather touchy OS and easily becomes unstable. Especially with such a full featured program like this one since many other cleaners do not search for as many files. A cleaner developed by a Micro$oft Certified partners team doesn&#039;t dare search this deep and broad into the OS. 

In closing, this is why so many negatives are posted against registry and system cleaners.

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To #133;</p>
<p>It is a rather dangerous procedure to run a registry cleaner more than 1 time consecutively. I would suggest to anyone to run only one time and close the program as this is where people crash their pcs.<br />
Of course understanding what you are removing is critical &#8211; see #130.</p>
<p>Then after running other programs and web surfing in a day and I suggest more than 1 day or hours of surfing, run the program again. You could wipe registry entries and other files that may be needed by other programs like shared files (related) which doesn&#8217;t make sense I know &#8211; but windows is a rather touchy OS and easily becomes unstable. Especially with such a full featured program like this one since many other cleaners do not search for as many files. A cleaner developed by a Micro$oft Certified partners team doesn&#8217;t dare search this deep and broad into the OS. </p>
<p>In closing, this is why so many negatives are posted against registry and system cleaners.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Tiwari</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Tiwari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59447</guid>
		<description>When i ran this program first time, it found 583 entries and i repaired all of them.
Immediately i ran it again, and to my surprise there were still 20 entries were found.I repaired them again and hoped that the wrong entries are now over.
I immediately ran the software third time and then it found 5 mroe entries which i repaired.
Finally after running the software for almost 5 times, i found 0 entries.
I hope this is not a bogus software and it really does something when it says repaired the  wrong entries.
Ashish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i ran this program first time, it found 583 entries and i repaired all of them.<br />
Immediately i ran it again, and to my surprise there were still 20 entries were found.I repaired them again and hoped that the wrong entries are now over.<br />
I immediately ran the software third time and then it found 5 mroe entries which i repaired.<br />
Finally after running the software for almost 5 times, i found 0 entries.<br />
I hope this is not a bogus software and it really does something when it says repaired the  wrong entries.<br />
Ashish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59425</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59425</guid>
		<description>#57, if you&#039;re going to get upset over a url link not lauching thru an interface button, you&#039;ll be waiting a LONG time to find a perfectly written piece of software.

I don&#039;t require the Help file and anyone else can easily go to the website and pull up help there. I know exactly what the program proposes to do with every single issue it finds and whether or not I want to go ahead with that recommendation or not. Since it will ALWAYS makes a registry backup BEFORE doing any changes, there is a safety net for anyone and zero risk in my case. But still don&#039;t anyone just go ahead and push &quot;repair all&quot; unless you know what you are doing!.

I find the other Options it gives you in the program will probably be of more use to users than the actual registry cleaning portion. These will make more of a difference to the system performance and are safer to implement for the average computer user than the registry cleaner section.

I mentioned this &#039;help file&#039; issue because the site asks for info and feedback on the program once you have used it; I like to be reasonably thorough with my program checks, before I dash on here and post something. 95% of the comments here could be erased and we&#039;d have lost nothing. Neither the other users here, GAoTD or the developer get anything useful from most of these irrelevant posts, which in this case includes yours.

I do however appreciate it when users post an alternative to the day&#039;s offering, as sometimes it will not work for certain versions of Windows or there may be other reasons and when an alternative is posted it provides a point of comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#57, if you&#8217;re going to get upset over a url link not lauching thru an interface button, you&#8217;ll be waiting a LONG time to find a perfectly written piece of software.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t require the Help file and anyone else can easily go to the website and pull up help there. I know exactly what the program proposes to do with every single issue it finds and whether or not I want to go ahead with that recommendation or not. Since it will ALWAYS makes a registry backup BEFORE doing any changes, there is a safety net for anyone and zero risk in my case. But still don&#8217;t anyone just go ahead and push &#8220;repair all&#8221; unless you know what you are doing!.</p>
<p>I find the other Options it gives you in the program will probably be of more use to users than the actual registry cleaning portion. These will make more of a difference to the system performance and are safer to implement for the average computer user than the registry cleaner section.</p>
<p>I mentioned this &#8216;help file&#8217; issue because the site asks for info and feedback on the program once you have used it; I like to be reasonably thorough with my program checks, before I dash on here and post something. 95% of the comments here could be erased and we&#8217;d have lost nothing. Neither the other users here, GAoTD or the developer get anything useful from most of these irrelevant posts, which in this case includes yours.</p>
<p>I do however appreciate it when users post an alternative to the day&#8217;s offering, as sometimes it will not work for certain versions of Windows or there may be other reasons and when an alternative is posted it provides a point of comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59411</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59411</guid>
		<description>Anyone with half a braincell, who knows anything about computers at all, would tell folks to leave the registry alone unless they &quot;Know&quot; what they&#039;re doing. Altering the registry isn&#039;t an area of computing for the dumbasses to &quot;Give it a go&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone with half a braincell, who knows anything about computers at all, would tell folks to leave the registry alone unless they &#8220;Know&#8221; what they&#8217;re doing. Altering the registry isn&#8217;t an area of computing for the dumbasses to &#8220;Give it a go&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcs3295</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59397</link>
		<dc:creator>kcs3295</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59397</guid>
		<description>#43 Addendum;

I&#039;m somewhat uncertain about posting more about this software give-away today. I haven&#039;t seen so much controversial postings before.

Please remember several things;
&gt; all software is work in progress,
&gt; users of pc&#039;s do so many different things and run various softwares,
&gt; the proper install and un-install are usually never followed,
&gt; web sites and surfing choices are countless and some harmful to pcs,
&gt; too many people rely on free version firewall and anti-virus apps,
&gt; the pc&#039;s are not updated as needed, drivers, bios, software in   general - especially (commerical) firewall, anti-virus, spyware, ect.
&gt; and the list is long of things people should or should not do. 

So these considerations and more combinations of possible uses of pc&#039;s are endless which brings me to the point. No two pc&#039;s contain the same problems or simlular software. And software developers are very diverse in developing their applications.

This software is a tool for experienced users - not something to play with. It&#039;s a great utility to use to learn about your pc and it offers more options than most other system cleaners.

If you do not understand the registry then do not use powerful software such as this. It&#039;s like open heart surgery to your pc.

I have been able to easily identify problems and the location in the registry so as to modify and/or delete the entry. Thumbs up for this software - it&#039;s a keeper. It installed and registered, gave the registration key so I can re-install if necessary. Ran smooth as silk.

I see where improvements can be made to this software so give the developer a chance. Wonder why they offered it to us? I believe to also gain positive feedback for improvements as well as to see what other people are using - so let the competing software be defined with user experiences.

Also, we are also fortunate to have Jonathan with us. If you have not visited his site - you are missing out on good info.

http://jonathanstoolbar.blogspot.com/

Please enjoy this site, respect others, and provide helpful advise and positive comments, and share your experiences with the software offered here and other sites.

Even experienced technicians and software developers will tell you there is still more to learn.

Thanks for reading,
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#43 Addendum;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m somewhat uncertain about posting more about this software give-away today. I haven&#8217;t seen so much controversial postings before.</p>
<p>Please remember several things;<br />
&gt; all software is work in progress,<br />
&gt; users of pc&#8217;s do so many different things and run various softwares,<br />
&gt; the proper install and un-install are usually never followed,<br />
&gt; web sites and surfing choices are countless and some harmful to pcs,<br />
&gt; too many people rely on free version firewall and anti-virus apps,<br />
&gt; the pc&#8217;s are not updated as needed, drivers, bios, software in   general &#8211; especially (commerical) firewall, anti-virus, spyware, ect.<br />
&gt; and the list is long of things people should or should not do. </p>
<p>So these considerations and more combinations of possible uses of pc&#8217;s are endless which brings me to the point. No two pc&#8217;s contain the same problems or simlular software. And software developers are very diverse in developing their applications.</p>
<p>This software is a tool for experienced users &#8211; not something to play with. It&#8217;s a great utility to use to learn about your pc and it offers more options than most other system cleaners.</p>
<p>If you do not understand the registry then do not use powerful software such as this. It&#8217;s like open heart surgery to your pc.</p>
<p>I have been able to easily identify problems and the location in the registry so as to modify and/or delete the entry. Thumbs up for this software &#8211; it&#8217;s a keeper. It installed and registered, gave the registration key so I can re-install if necessary. Ran smooth as silk.</p>
<p>I see where improvements can be made to this software so give the developer a chance. Wonder why they offered it to us? I believe to also gain positive feedback for improvements as well as to see what other people are using &#8211; so let the competing software be defined with user experiences.</p>
<p>Also, we are also fortunate to have Jonathan with us. If you have not visited his site &#8211; you are missing out on good info.</p>
<p><a href="http://jonathanstoolbar.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jonathanstoolbar.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Please enjoy this site, respect others, and provide helpful advise and positive comments, and share your experiences with the software offered here and other sites.</p>
<p>Even experienced technicians and software developers will tell you there is still more to learn.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading,<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tones</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59394</link>
		<dc:creator>Tones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59394</guid>
		<description>#36 you have said it all... What on earth would make someone want to touch the registry on their PC! Most people would not have the faintest idea what the registry even does let alone want to &quot;Clean&quot; it.. 

The registry does not affect the speed of a computer in the slightest so unless you are an advanced computer user then it is simply best left alone. Wait till tomorrow and see what else comes along..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#36 you have said it all&#8230; What on earth would make someone want to touch the registry on their PC! Most people would not have the faintest idea what the registry even does let alone want to &#8220;Clean&#8221; it.. </p>
<p>The registry does not affect the speed of a computer in the slightest so unless you are an advanced computer user then it is simply best left alone. Wait till tomorrow and see what else comes along..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggest_Baddest_Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/comment-page-3/#comment-59393</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggest_Baddest_Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/registry-easy/#comment-59393</guid>
		<description>#32: Didn&#039;t run into any false positives here, on none of the machines that I installed it on.

After installing it on this machine and purposely mocking some things up to see how the program would handle that, I&#039;ve become more impressed.
It&#039;s not perfect (made two of the items in the start-menu&#039;s start-up folder dissapear, but a restore from the backup fixed that) but it does a great job.
It did speed up reboot-time from 4 minutes and some seconds to 2 minutes and some seconds (close to 3 minutes), by getting rid of a pile of hard-to-find clutter left by old software.
It missed only one replicated problem, everything else it nailed, and it did so in what I consider record speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32: Didn&#8217;t run into any false positives here, on none of the machines that I installed it on.</p>
<p>After installing it on this machine and purposely mocking some things up to see how the program would handle that, I&#8217;ve become more impressed.<br />
It&#8217;s not perfect (made two of the items in the start-menu&#8217;s start-up folder dissapear, but a restore from the backup fixed that) but it does a great job.<br />
It did speed up reboot-time from 4 minutes and some seconds to 2 minutes and some seconds (close to 3 minutes), by getting rid of a pile of hard-to-find clutter left by old software.<br />
It missed only one replicated problem, everything else it nailed, and it did so in what I consider record speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.493 seconds -->

