<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Musereo Mono to Stereo Converter comments:]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/</link>
<description><![CDATA[free licensed software daily]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:10:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>FeedWriter</generator>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Crazy Al]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120847</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is a follow up: 9/8/2010

I used the program for the first time today. I took an 8 track recording I did for a game background. I originally mixed to mono (just to get an idea of what it sounded like...... and thought HEY!

What a good time to try this program out.

The results were interesting. 
A backing bongo track sounded great.
most of the rest of the tracks sounded like an ural exciter/dynamics enhancer. However ........

One of the basic tracks that kind of creates the fundamental track is totally mixed out. It's definitely in the original mono track and is equal on both sides of the track

The recording was of a yamaha keyboard, on the "ritual" setting playing half notes and whole notes. The track was totally mixed out of the recording. The mic was a simple condenser mic(small diaphragm)

The remaining track is interesting, but not my original intent.

This needs to be fixed]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:10:18 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120847</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crazy Al]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: MyndPhreak]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120845</link>
<description><![CDATA[As already mentioned, this can be done with audacity, which is free and does a much better job. Offering this program for any price, even if it's $0.99 would be absurd. If something can do the same job with a much better result and for free, why pay? I do give the creator credit for...well...creating it.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:51:30 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120845</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MyndPhreak]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Jeffinprov]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120844</link>
<description><![CDATA[Much heavy breathing about "true" stereo.  Come on!  I spend a fair amount of time doing audio restorations for my own entertainment from a variety of 78rpm and early LP material.  This is a fun little toy, fast and completely point-and-shoot.  In playing with it, I worked on a mono RCA LP of the Sauter-Finegan Orchestra that is unlikely to find its way to CD.  After some discrete noise removal and EQ to my taste, this program brought out some detailing in the elaborate orchestrations that I hadn't noticed before.  Also used it to goose up a fairly lifeless transfer of an Astaire-Rodgers soundtrack, with very pleasing results and relatively little accentuation of the buckets of original track distortion.  I would happily buy this... but NOT for $39.95.  $19.95 would make it very appealing.   Thanks, GOTD!!!!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:21:31 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120844</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffinprov]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Chuckles55]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120843</link>
<description><![CDATA[My father recently passed away.  I found an old tape that he had recorded in mono of a bunch of 40's music.  After running it through this program, it has a lot more umph and seems more rich in tones.  Not sure what the nay-sayers don't like.  As for me and my untrained ears, this is a real keeper!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:16:35 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120843</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles55]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Dan]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120842</link>
<description><![CDATA[To #30, Don,

You can get an adapter for the headphones, that will let it go to both ears, in mono of course. You plug the adapter into the source, and the headphones into the adapter. They're a couple bucks at Radio Shack, etc.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:21:35 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120842</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Frank D]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120841</link>
<description><![CDATA[#32: You said: "You could also Google “electronically reprocessed stereo” or “duophonic”. The process is not difficult however."

I've Googled these terms but have not found a satisfactory procedure to produce an effect equal to that of Musereo. Thank you for your method for producing duophonic stereo in Audacity, but I found that for me it is not simple or quick (having to open the file, create two tracks and apply two comb filters, one to each, then tweak levels, add reverb and replace the original file), and not as good as Musereo which is just one step, fast, and good. The only down sides to Musereo are (1) it loses MP3 header information and (2) the output file is twice the size of the input file. If the developers can fix those two stumbling blocks, Musereo would be a must-have for me.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:52:21 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120841</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank D]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: The Grey Area]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120840</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ok, I just tried it on one of my acoustic guitar tracks, which is just two mono tracks, really. Honestly, it sounded better before. This program, while it did sort of give the illusion of stereo width, just made it sound thin and worse than the original. I don't think there is any reason to try to make a mono x2 (fake stereo) track sound any better. It just isn't possible, really. As I said, the only reason I could ever find to use such a program is if there just is no sound at all on a right or left channel. Otherwise, you're just pissing in the wind, IMO. If this thing had an EQ to add the bass it robs, it might help.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:36:47 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120840</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Grey Area]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: The Grey Area]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120839</link>
<description><![CDATA[Basically, if you have a true mono track, the best you can do is copy the same track to the other channel, making it mono on both right and left. While it's not true stereo, it is the best option there is, unless you don't mind hearing sounds come from just one speaker/channel. Most programs do this automatically, because nobody wants to hear sounds come from just one side. If you never had stereo, you can't magically create it. That should go without saying. It's just the best way to enhance a mono track...so quit all the bitching and just accept it! LOL If you know anything about music, this shouldn't even be the topic of debate at all. The only thing that should be of importance here is how well this app enhances a mono track. Mono x2 does not = stereo. We all know that, but it's your only option. Unless I have a track that only plays through one side, or is completely out of balance, I probably wouldn't even attempt to do anything to it.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:12:45 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120839</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Grey Area]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: dog]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120838</link>
<description><![CDATA[3 excellent Freeware Options:

Audacity
Kristal
Wavosaur

Just for fun I checked these. The instruction manual for the "simplest" of them was 62 pages long!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:02:22 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120838</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dog]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Mark]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120837</link>
<description><![CDATA[After converting to fake stereo, the resulting track only lasts about 40 seconds. It does a nice job sound wise for fake stereo, but if it can't convert the whole track, what's the point?]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:55:38 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/musereo-mono-to-stereo-converter/#comment-120837</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>