MemoryCleanerComments on:

By: HR outsourcing

HR outsourcing — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:17:00 +0000

Memory cleaner is one of the best tool giving good functionality. it might help to boost speed of our PC. lets have a look it.

By: Thom

Thom — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:31:11 +0000

I am glad I downloaded this program. It has helped with a couple of other computers. I would recommend it to anyone with real low amount of memory and would like to be able to use their system without it crashing all the time.

By: TK

TK — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:39:57 +0000

#98 then be sensible and install an operating system and applications that run happily in 512M RAM, ie if you must use XP trim it down by switching off unnessesary services and visual effects.

Pre-allocate several hundred megabytes of paging file in freshly unfragmented space by first disabling virtual memory, performing a complete defragment of the drive, then re-enable virtual memory, setting the minimum size to 512M or greater and leaving the maximum at its default or 2048M or so which ever is largest thus leaving room for it to grow, just in case. If it ever gets to the point that you are using 1Gig+ of paging file with 512M of physical RAM then your system will be crawling along at an unbearably slow rate anyway

No amount of tweaking or 3rd party utilities will make Vista fly in 512M of system RAM it will be forced to use the paging file far too often to do an adequate processor or video card justice.

By: Legoman

Legoman — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 06:32:48 +0000

“bougth more ram” what if computer have ram limit? Like 512mt are max?

By: Michael Spurlock

Michael Spurlock — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:53:51 +0000

I agree that memory OPTIMIZERS were a dismal failure, but this sounds more like a leash on overuse of physical memory. Memory optimizers and any software that says it’s going to “ADD” RAM ALWAYS cause more problems than they’re worth. Eventually, I had so many problems, even with TweakRAM, that I uninstalled it.
Let’s face it: Windows programs are rubbish at memory management. I have the most RAM my machine will take and I still have problems. Granted I have more security on my machine than most people, but those apps aren’t the only offenders. NO PROGRAM should consume more than 50% of CPU, or more than 75% of RAM, or use more than 4GB of virtual RAM. I don’t care what it is. It’s just bad design.

By: melc

melc — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:49:23 +0000

i can tell from what people are saying, some did not even bothered to download the app, let alone try it… but they are so eager to recommend their own crappy softwares instead… i’m used to read other users coments and actually find links to more powerful and better softwares then ones in the giveaway…

well, today is not your day guys, as of now i can see 88 posts and not even one with a decent similar software, no sir, not even Clean Ram… tried them all, and in my advanced geek lifetime this is the only one from over 50 both free and trial/share that i got to test who actually unloads both himself and the other apps that take more ram then they require. do remember to get the updated version, and don’t set it to work on automatic; use instead the free ram button whenever you need it

you may say many softs have the same features
that is as saying many bottles look the same
but its not looks we are after
its effect or content
and quality that we are after

i agree such apps are not of use to all
but those that do actually need such software
won’t be disappointed

one last say to the dumb one that decided to vote my test that provided you guys with results from not one, but 3 different systems
as “not useful” : wow, you actually had to turn off your screensaver to come vote my post, thus i really appreciate you did so much more work then i did for our comunity

By: Jarvic Dido

Jarvic Dido — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:20:56 +0000

Jimmy Kolo, A.K.A. “Jimmy the Geek” The Vista King! WTF? Jimmy says that this app. rocks with Vista. THAT IS GOOD FOR ME!!!! Jimmy, developed 90% of all Vista source code for Vista and has been my mentor for the past 16 years. Thank you GOTD for providing such a quality product!!!

By: Frank

Frank — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:58:38 +0000

Bottom line — the only good memory is filled memory. What is this stupid preoccupation with keeping your memory “clean?” Your memory cache speeds things up by reducing disk access … this type of stupidware makes your hard drives work harder and your system is slower overall.

You’re more likely to find truth in advertising from those penis enlargment emails in your spam folder ….

By: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 2+2=5

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 2+2=5 — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:33:55 +0000

This little gem cleared up 110 Megs of space in 21 seconds. Much faster than buying 512 Meg of Ram. Which is faster, a few hours or 21 seconds?

By: Fubar

Fubar — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:25:30 +0000

In addition to my previous comment (I can’t give the number since it’s in moderation), instead of paying attention to the random comments here from people who think they know what they are talking about, you should read what Microsoft has to say:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555223
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_mpmonperf_15.mspx?mfr=true
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308417
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/237740
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314482
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274598

Additionally, practical RAM limits are typically much lower than what Microsoft claims. For XP, anything above something like 2GB is a waste; for Vista, I think it’s around 3GB. Further, memory controller architecture affects optimal physical RAM usage. For most users with AMD CPU’s, you’re better off to use 2 DRAM slots instead of 4.