<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Mamutu comments:]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/</link>
<description><![CDATA[free licensed software daily]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>FeedWriter</generator>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: zvaragabor]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43629</link>
<description><![CDATA[Will it be available later?]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:11:19 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43629</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[zvaragabor]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: somewind]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43628</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have been prompted to update the program pretty regularly.

Afterwards I noticed I was put on a 30 day trial.

As it turns out, putting the regular registration (1 year back) was not a problem, just a matter of clicking (settings, license, refreshing licences)

I like this program.  I am very concerned about keystroke loggers am pleased at how this finds suspicious behavior.  It noticed google accelerator was doing stuff in the background, which it is suppose to do, and I just indicated that was ok and it asks no more.

And it does not have noticable effect performance.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:46:15 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43628</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[somewind]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Mom]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43627</link>
<description><![CDATA[Uninstalled this one today. It was constantly popping up wanting me to block something I run constantly making it more of an issue than the problems it was supposed to fix in my opinion.  Give me a one time scan program and I might use it, but this was extremely irritating.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43627</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mom]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Sonny Chiba]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43626</link>
<description><![CDATA[blech.  Not really worth installing unless you like annoying popups everytime you try and run your regular apps.  Just eats system resources.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:08:48 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43626</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonny Chiba]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Carol]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43625</link>
<description><![CDATA[It may be because I'm not computer savvy enough but I used the program for a day and then deleted it. It sounded good and was very easy to install if you follow the instructions. I have no issues with the way the program is offered as I have found some great programs here that I have highly recommended to others - even bought two to have  the updates. 

I found that my settings seemed to change (like the screen that came up when I went to shut down)which made me uneasy. I also wasn't too sure what to do about some of the messages when I went to use other programs - they seemed a little iffy. 

I have run McAfee successfully for years and it always seems to pick up viruses and adware. Never had a problem. There could be programs running amok in the background that this program would be great with, but maybe in my case, ignorance is bliss.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:15:28 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43625</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Marie]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43624</link>
<description><![CDATA[After running this for a couple of days on a spare computer, I'm not thrilled with it.  It's warned me that my phone dialer acts like a phone dialer and that Firefox connects to the internet.  If I launch a game, it warns me about that.  For the most part, it just doesn't give enough information for a user to know whether or not to block something.  

I'm also having to reboot my computer frequently.  It's an old computer and it seems to get hung up when Mamutu wants to keep popping in warnings that I'm using a computer.

Marie]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:48:06 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43624</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Fubar]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43623</link>
<description><![CDATA[#174, Steven Avery, I disagree with some of your recommendations.  There is value in looking at security forums, but they're the same as any other forums--an extremely small percentage of posters know what they're talking about, and a high percentage don't.  I prefer solid tests (and not heavily biased magazine tests).

If you check firewall leak tests, Online Armor and the paid versions of Agnitum Outpost Firewall/Security Suite Pro 2008 are the only firewalls which pass all public leak tests as of November, 2007 (new tests are being designed).  Following are Matousec's results (scroll down for tables).  Note that newer versions of some products were/are available.
http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-personal-firewall-analysis/leak-tests-results.php
Sunbelt, Norton, etc., do particularly bad.

The standard for anti-virus testing is Virus Bulletin:
http://www.virusbtn.com/index
Their complete results are only available on a commercial basis, but many magazines give brief results, and partial results are available on the website with a free registration.

For a free firewall (only), Online Armor is best.  You have to pay to get the best protection.  Online Armor uses Kaspersky AV, which occasionally makes the security news for various problems.  NOD32 is generally the best AV.  For paid versions, I prefer Agnitum Oupost Firewall/Security Suite Pro 2008.  They have community-based, expert-filtered rule distribution which Online Armor lacks, AFAIK.  You can see their daily statistics here:
http://www.agnitum.com/support/improvenet/stats.php
I have licenses for NOD32 and both Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro 2008 and Agnitum Outpost Security Suite Pro 2008 (there was an update to both a couple of days ago).  Agnitum's anti-virus is definitely weaker than NOD32.  I had been running NOD32 plus OFP 2008 on my recently deceased XP box, but I'm going to try OSS Pro 2008 on my new Vista box--the slight decrease in anti-virus protection should be offset by the increased overall protection of the fully-integrated suite.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:56:54 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43623</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fubar]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Fubar]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43622</link>
<description><![CDATA[Although I uninstalled this shortly after testing it, I was looking at Vista's endless logs (useful, but no wonder it's such a dog--it logs everything) and noticed that one of Mamutu's kernel modules is unsigned--unacceptable for security software, even though the code is from another source (one of them should have signed the code, especially since it hooks into everything).]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:58:56 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43622</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fubar]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Sue]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43621</link>
<description><![CDATA[tried to install and had problems. Got my virus program fixed and went to get this installed....  Now it's not available.  Grrrr..  once downloaded..  I wish we had more time to install when there are problems.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:14:33 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43621</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: debugger]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43620</link>
<description><![CDATA[Addition to my post #172:
Mamutu is not reliable as it deos not necessarily suspend the supicious activity before it leads to any consequence. This can be easily tested by using RegMon and double clicking on a registry key/value. I don't know if this is specific to that type of activity or a general problem though.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:56:17 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/mamutu/#comment-43620</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[debugger]]></dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>