<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Image Converter Plus comments:]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/</link>
<description><![CDATA[free licensed software daily]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>FeedWriter</generator>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Geek Grrl]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118611</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nice--my only issue is the right-click preview. Really hangs things up when you may just be trying to use the right-click for something other than this product.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:05:05 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118611</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geek Grrl]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: janet]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118610</link>
<description><![CDATA[Is there ANY image conversion program where you can do batch editing where not every image has the EXACTLY the same settings? 
An example: 
Suppose you have a bunch of photos with a bluish tint which you want to remove, but each individual picture might need a little more or a little less of the blue reduction. Can this be done? I have all the image converters from Goatd over the years, but I don't believe any of them can do this.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:54:19 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118610</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[janet]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: jugem]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118609</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ｔｏｄａｙ’ｓ　ｐｒｏｇｒａｍ　ｉｓ　ａ　Ｋｅｅｐｅｒ！
Ｉ　ｌｉｋｅ　ｉｔ　ｖｅｒｙ　ｍｕｃｈ．
Ｖｉｄｅｏ　Ｔｕｔｏｒｉａｌ　ｉｓ　ｎｉｃｅ，　ｔｏｏ．
http://www.youtube.com/user/ImageConverterPlus#p/a/u/1/aniCSxb6La0
Ｔｗｏ　ｔｈｕｍｂｓ　Ｗａｙ　ＵＰ　ｆｏｒ　ｔｏｄａｙ’ｓ　Ｉｍａｇｅ　Ｃｏｎｖｅｒｔｅｒ　Ｐｌｕｓ！

Ｔｅｓｔｅｄ　ＯＳ：Ｖｉｓｔａ（３２）]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:35:18 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118609</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jugem]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Andrew]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118608</link>
<description><![CDATA[One of the best ever giveaways.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:29:25 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118608</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Ray]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118607</link>
<description><![CDATA[Any converting program has to pass a baseline test for me. This test consists of how the program handles stretching of a black-and-white image (1600x1200 24 Bit Depth 600ppi) to 300 times its original size, JPG 24(True Color,YCbCr)Bpp  image quality 100, compression mode baseline (1:1:1(11:11:11) default), quality should be good, then recompressing the image back down to its original size and back to 300 times its size again. The resulting quality should still be good or the program has failed and is not worth reviewing further. For the programs that that passed this first step I continue to compress and re-stretch the image until the program fails to produce a good-quality image. As most would note as with any photograph that is stretched, compressed, stretched and compressed again Serious Degradation usually occurs. It is the speed at which this degradation occurs that is the nature of this test. Most programs don't make it past the second stretching before serious degradation has evolved (Format Factory, though one of my favorites, has fallen into this category). 

I was quite impressed with Image Converter Plus, the program took five of these repetitions before any serious degradation  of the photograph (minor blurring of features) had occurred. I have also run the same process  using a color photograph with the same characteristics as the one mentioned above and with near the same result, still quite impressive.

For those who are wondering what type of photographs I used, it was that of the face of a child. Facial features suffer from degradation faster than any photograph I have ever used for this test.

Why black-and-white you might ask? Gray shading seems to be the hardest thing to duplicate for any program I have tested. Even Photoshop (which I use a lot), also fails at the fifth pass (the same time as Image Converter Plus).

So is the program worth getting? - YES.

Are there other freeware options that can do the same? -  Though there are many freeware alternatives available that achieve a decent result after the first pass or two, I have found none that will pass this test past level 3.

My system is a Dell precision 490
Operating system windows XP Pro SP3


Ray]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:15:33 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118607</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: mike]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118606</link>
<description><![CDATA[#8: <em>"... The install was clean, but no doubt mike will complain that it actually adds files and registry entries to your computer. The EULA was written by an over-zealous lawyer. ..."</em>

No offense even hinted at, I'm amused that you consider reading the EULA <em>[usually an unenforceable, often not legally binding (you can't require illegal conditions), cut/paste affair]</em> more important that what an app install does to Windows. :-) 

At any rate, I wasn't aware my bias was *that* apparent &amp; I'll try to do better :-) ... personally when looking at any app I want to know what it does, &amp; what's the cost -- not just in dollars, but total cost from disk space to learning curve to does it mess with my Windows install. With Image Converter Plus for example, compared to IrfanView &amp; XnView the right click profile access isn't worth the cost in disk space, the (relatively light, but still there) addition to registry bloat, &amp; the fact I can't install it anywhere, everywhere, any time. Add in that the best it has to offer for re-sizing is bi-linear, &amp; I'm even less impressed.

But that's me, &amp; I do try to eliminate my own bias <em>[unless I feel an app's really terrible]</em>, &amp; just present what info I have so everyone can make up their own mind, &amp; of course in hopes that at least some of it's useful to someone. Extracting setup file components &amp; monitoring install is just what I do, &amp; since it's sometimes time consuming, feel sharing the results might save someone else some time. I *try* to limit details of added files/folders/reg entries so they're not too terribly excessive, but still give an idea of impact plus a hint of where to look for leftovers if/when someone uninstalled the GOTD <em>[and there often are leftovers]</em>. Besides, between you &amp; Ashraf &amp; several others, Fubar, there's usually more than enough pros/cons posted. :-)

*  *  *

#29: <em>"Is this prog better than IrfanView?"</em>

Depends on what you want/need since IMHO they don't *directly* compete. If you want to setup customized profiles, then right-click convert images using your profiles, maybe you'll like today's GOTD. If you want to do more than that, like editing, stick with IrfanView [or whatever you're using -- there are dozens of good apps avail].

*  *  *

#31: <em>"... driver installed just as a demo and watermark is obtained in Print. ..."</em>

As in the directions [at top of page &amp; in readme.txt file], you need to start the app, go to Help -&gt; About -&gt; Click the activate button -&gt; paste the key from the readme.txt file...]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:28:27 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118606</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Rick Siegert]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118605</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have been reading the comments on RAW conversion with interest.  First of all, every manufacturer has to upgrade their RAW conversion every time that they increase their maximum Pixel count.  So that is a moving target.  Every photographer that I know of has their own favorite RAW processor, whether in a program or or stand alone.  Then after conversion, the image is edited, even cursory edits, before the image is ready for publication, printing or sharing. So I do not see the lack of the most recent RAW cameras as a problem.  I would not use this program before I converted an image into TIFF or another format and edited the image.  

For its stated purpose, I think it is excellent and easier to use than cranking up my editing programs.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:14:14 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118605</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Siegert]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Keter]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118603</link>
<description><![CDATA[Installed and ran perfectly on Win7Pro x64.  Took less than 10 minutes to download, install, register, and convert 77 600dpi color scanned images to 96dpi.  User interface is both attractive and very intuitive and offers plenty of options. Output image quality is excellent; massive downsizing of scanned images like what I did is a real challenge to maintain image clarity, and ImageConverterPlus did a good job.  Keeper.

#31 - The license number is in the README.TXT file. Read it!]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:38:58 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118603</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keter]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: mike]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118602</link>
<description><![CDATA[Image Converter Plus lets you set up *profiles*, a combination of re-size + format conversion + filter/FX, that you can access from Windows' right-click Context Menu. Other than that, i.e. for other purposes, it's very much a so-so image editing utility -- surprisingly it doesn't even offer bi-cubic re-sizing, let alone more advanced methods sometimes seen in freeware. <em>[The lack of re-sizing algo's shouldn't be a problem if all you're doing is creating low-rez thumbnails.]</em>

Bearing in mind that Image Converter Plus focuses on profiles you create &amp; then access via the Context Menu [so the program window where you create profiles is less important], you get a 2 tabbed, re-sizable window -- 1 tab is for creating/managing profiles, &amp; 1 tab lets you add photos, primarily to judge how the profile you're creating will look &amp; work. Both tabs have a Show Preview/Hide Preview button, &amp; with the preview showing there's a Generate button to show a small preview of how the image will look after applying your profile. Most of the export formats have a good number of settings <em>[using the profile tab, click "more" after selecting your export format]</em>, &amp; by clicking "Add Operation" you access the re-sizing dialog + several minor filters -- noticeably missing is any sort of automatic optimization as seen in many of these free &amp; payware image utilities.

Image Converter Plus, itself takes up ~53MB, 210 files, 11 folders. Besides the Start Menu shortcuts, to store profiles 2 folders are added under Docs &amp; Settings [My Docs &amp; All Users Docs], while 4 logs are saved [along with converted images by default] to My Docs. One files is added to the system folder &amp; registered with Windows: "cnvshell.dll". InstallWatch Pro recorded 318 new registry entries, but today's GOTD doesn't take over image file associations -- it isn't a file viewer/organizer sort of program, though it does include a separate app called My ViewPad where you can drag/drop images. The FAQ on the app's site says your hardware ID is used for activation, unlike many GOTD offers that can be (re)installed later.

Far as image converters are concerned, when I 1st started out with PCs I thought "Wow, now I can open &amp; convert all these image formats". Years later I have yet to even see an image file in 99% of them. If I do ever get *stuck*, there's the portable version of XnView [http://portableapps.com/apps/graphics_pictures/xnview_portable] -- XnView itself [xnview.com] supports over 400 formats, &amp; their site also has a Shell Extension, versions for Smartphone, PocketPC, MAC &amp; Linux, And they've got fixpicture.org where you can convert images on-line.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:34:36 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118602</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[By: Blaise]]></title>
<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118601</link>
<description><![CDATA[Program deserves a thumb-up for quality.

However, the developers don't explain well enough why it is worth $49. I compared a simple batch resize with this vs FastStone Viewer. Both worked well, as far as I could tell. In fact, I preferred the FastStone operation over this one as it seemed easier to understand to me. (I also prefer using FastStone Viewer to their viewer.)

So, why is IC+ supposed to be better? Does IC+ actually support a lot more formats -- $50 worth? Is the quality of the conversions actually better than that of FastStone's?

Also, I am one of those users who prefers a lot of options. I don't want any software attaching itself to Explorer's right-click-menu without an option to edit or remove it.

My suggestion to the company is to accentuate the advantages of your program over all others -- especially great free-for-home-use ones like FastStone and Irfanview.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:24:58 -0400</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/image-converter-plus/#comment-118601</guid>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaise]]></dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>