<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: policy - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/tags/policy</link>
		<description>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: policy - Recent Posts</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.2</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/rss/tags/policy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Anonymous on "Calls For Creation Without Copyright To Become EU Policy"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/14796#post-108187</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 04:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">108187@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://links.giveawayoftheday.com/techdirt.com/articles%2F20121001%2F09521520557%2Feuropean-parliament-committee-calls-creation-without-copyright-to-become-eu-policy.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121001/09521520557/european-parliament-committee-calls-creation-without-copyright-to-become-eu-policy.shtml</a></p>
<p>European Parliament Committee Calls For Creation Without Copyright To Become EU Policy<br />
from the whaaat? dept</p>
<p>Opinion of the International Trade Committee on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy (pdf.)</p>
<p>It begins with the usual boring statements about how the internet has become a part of the public space where new forms of cross-border trade are achieved</p>
<p>But that&#39;s nothing to what comes afterwards:<br />
    Calls on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPR to do so;<br />
Yes, you read that correctly: an official document from the important trade committee of the European Parliament is calling for the option to create without copyright being attached.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BuBBy on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/3#post-7907</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BuBBy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7907@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>You've convinced me.  :)</p>
<p>Closed.</p>
<p>*phew*
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BigThunder1 on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/3#post-7906</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BigThunder1</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7906@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>BuBBy's right. A dead horse is a dead horse and all should stop beating on it. The point has been made, GOTD isn't going to respond to any of this. Chalk it up as lesson learned and move on. I'm not taking anyones side in the matter, and I think the whole situation was/is a bad mark that GOTD will just have to live with as well. The developers!... well they just cut their own throat and will have to live with it (of course I don't think their gonna survive long with their underhanded attitude). If the PTB were going to do or say anything about this, it would've been said and done already. What more <em>can</em> they do at this point? The damage is done, nobody is going to give the developer another chance even if they offered it, and the complaints haven't gone unnoticed, you can bet on that. The developers are toast in the eyes of this community and if GOTD got the message, we likely won't have to go through this again. If we do, ...well, that will be strike two and will likely hurt GOTD far more than any-one-person that dwnlds an app from here. It's been very well established through the firestorm here that spread across the Internet as well that people won't put up with the tactics that Morpheus used from <em>any</em> developer/vendor. Greed has a way of coming full circle on people and will suffocate them into the abyss of history in due time.</p>
<p>Let's all just move along and get over it.</p>
<p><strong>BuBBy,</strong> I think you should close this thread and get back to the business at hand. The point has been made. The policy will either be adhered to, or changed to suit the desires of the PTB. This is the only action that will come of all this. GOTD will either stand by their stated commitment in the future and be more attentive to what's being given them to post, or change their policy. Time to move on.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BuBBy on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7905</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BuBBy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7905@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>I was not saying that anybody who advises people to read EULAs is a "nobhead" - I was and still do maintain that anybody with <em>the expectation</em> that everyone should read them - and if you don't read them (or overlook a checkbox) then you deserve everything you get. In effect, "everybody can read, how hard is it".</p>
<p>Malware and parasite type software and toolbars that hide behind a EULA and user acceptance - doesn't make the software "OK". I've seen too many EULAs with clauses like "we can change the terms at any stage, and will post the details of any changes on our webpage." - of course it's in legalese and not English my mother would understand.</p>
<p>Many users don't know that the toolbar software is bad or good. If they trust the software it arrives with, they implicitly (but wrongly) trust the "extras". Anyone who looks down their nose and blames computer users who are less net-savy than themselves as ignorant or "serves them right" does nothing for their own credibility or understanding towards other people. </p>
<p>My "un-moderator" like dig was just a generalisation, mentioning that there are ignorant people out there who believe that they are much "smarter" than other users because they "just know" what is "bad software" and what is "good software". </p>
<p>I didn't mention any names or specific examples. To some people such a comment might just "ring true" and pause for thought. I'm sure those people can see for themselves, that their ability to show some understanding towards less experienced users probably needs a little work. </p>
<p>It seems you are the only person to have come forward to distance yourself from displaying such a viewpoint. Good to see.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FABScott on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7904</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FABScott</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7904@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>I personally don't, [and nobody I know] reads EULAs these days but that doesn't mean someone who advises others to do so is a nobhead[sic]  If that un-moderator like dig was aimed at me, forget it, I am not suggesting anyone should either.</p>
<p>For anyone wishing to check an EULA without the bother of reading it, may I recommend the EULAlyzer offered free from the excellent javacool people.</p>
<p><a href="http://links.giveawayoftheday.com/javacoolsoftware.com/eulalyzer.html">http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/eulalyzer.html</a></p>
<p>Also consider their free Spywareblaster available at the same site.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BuBBy on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7897</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BuBBy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7897@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>I should add here that Morpheus add the toolbars to all of their downloads. This wasn't something that GOTD added - or that GOTD failed to remove. They do not change the setup programs that the developers provide.</p>
<p>Instead, a preferred (in my opinion) course of action would be to refuse the giveaway from Morpheus until Morpheus removed the toolbars from the setup. While I don't disagree with peoples right to express their disapproval or disappointment in the inclusion of the toolbars in a GOTD giveaway - I think the point has been made, and I'd like to move on.</p>
<p>I'm sure the site owners are aware of how people feel - and the fact that there has been no statement made, clearly isn't going to change just because people continue to retread the same ground talking about it on, and on and on.</p>
<p>Nobody is defending the inclusion of the toolbars, and everyone agrees it is a bad thing (except for the occasional nobhead who feels that reading a 10 page legal agreement and license acceptance must be standard practice before someones mum installs a new program - like that is going to make any sense or actually happen), this discussion hasn't really introduced any new issues or progressed in the past 48 hours.</p>
<p>I think the GOTD team know (now) it was a bad thing - they probably didn't "join the dots" and realise it would be such a big issue at the time - now they know. Really I'm prepared to write this off to a bad experience and just hope it doesn't happen again (please... at least for the sake of us moderators... this is just one big headache).
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeremiah on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7896</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jeremiah</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7896@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>FABScott,<br />
Again, you're right. And I don't think you're being a smartass. I personally don't understand how anyone could recommend ANY download site to someone who's not at least a little familiar with crapware protection. I also am not that worried about GOTD's giveaways. And people really should use caution no matter what they're downloading.<br />
BUT, Dealio and Snap were not part of the advertised giveaway. From what I understand they are both at least suspect. Therefore they shouldn't have been included at all. Again, it's GOTD's own policy. I'm not blaming GOTD for possible damage to other people's computers. I don't think GOTD will suddenly lose all their visitors over this. And I don't think this warrants a class action law suit (that still makes me chuckle). I just think they should back up what they clearly advertise.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7892</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7892@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>FABScott<br />
you have a very good point<br />
I agree with your view<br />
sorry if I sounded mean<br />
but the problem is that even thought every one needs to be careful with downloading software, "we" would think that "we" would not have to be with GOTD because it is legal and 100% safe
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FABScott on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7891</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FABScott</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7891@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>[quote = jeremiah] And by the way, tracking cookies ARE considered to be potentially harmful by a lot of people. Not because of what they do, but because the information they collect can be easily exploited.[/quote]<br />
True; they are considered potentially harmful though in the majority of cases they are harmless.<br />
There again anything produced by Microsoft [for example] has been proved to be easily exploited in the past. So my advice is that we should take extra precautions whether we download from GAOD or not.  I'm not trying to be a smartarse but it isn't so difficult for anyone to do.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeremiah on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7889</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jeremiah</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7889@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>FABScott,<br />
You're absolutely correct. Everyone needs to be careful with downloaded software. But so what? There were several issues with that giveaway (not as advertised, crippled software, etc.). It's still very clear that GOTD's policy is to not include ANY adware/spyware in the giveaways.<br />
If Dealio or Snap can be considered adware or spyware, then GOTD should not have included them. Period.<br />
And by the way, tracking cookies ARE considered to be potentially harmful by a lot of people. Not because of what they do, but because the information they collect can be easily exploited.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7877</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7877@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>tracking cookies are not spy ware,<br />
but information could be not safe<br />
and....<br />
I believe that some spy ware scanners do include tracking cookies as "spy ware"<br />
BUT<br />
the MAIN POINT of THIS topic<br />
IS<br />
1. It is not 100% safe if a "program" included in the download is not safe<br />
2. GOTD has not been doing anything about this (as far as visitors know)<br />
3. Just because some people know the difference about tracking cookies and spy ware, safe and unsafe programs, virus and spy ware, it does not mean everyone does<br />
Don't forget that some people who come to this site are not even familiar with the basices of computers<br />
my parents don't know the difference between virus, spy ware, trojon....
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kalelin38 on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7876</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kalelin38</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7876@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>FABScott</p>
<p>I use to run a community computer lab which gives me a lot a experience with the why some people think when they uses computers. There are a lot of people that would automatically install those items without a second thought not realizing that they had install something bad. A lot of people think automatically it if comes as an option it must be safe. Then you get those people that rush thought the install using all the defaults like most software install. And there are many other kind of users out there. I would volunteer a lot of times to go to these peoples houses and fix there computer and a lot of times it was spyware/adware related problems.</p>
<p>With that said, I can't honestly support a website that tell users all the software you download is 100% safe. Clicking a box to not install doesn't mean it's 100% safe it means it's a scam the the developer's of the software are using to exploit the type of people I use to deal with daily.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FABScott on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7875</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FABScott</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7875@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>playboy85 &#38; kalelin38<br />
Please don't talk rubbish.<br />
Do you think tracking cookies are "spyware" too?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jucati on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7874</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jucati</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7874@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>Free spyware checker/cleaner - AdAware <a href="http://links.giveawayoftheday.com/lavasoftusa.com/">http://www.lavasoftusa.com/</a></p>
<p>I wouldn't even ask for their Plus/Pro versions just because the Free version does 99% of what it needs to do anyway.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>playboy85 on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7873</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>playboy85</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7873@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>What's next GOTD, 007 Keylogger? Since you have taken a liking to infecting your users with spyware, how about a free spyware checker?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kalelin38 on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7872</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kalelin38</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7872@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>I'm thinking of writing it in my blog on myspace. I took down my link to GOTD because of their lack of response to this issue. </p>
<p>GOTD you are losing face, you better answer soon before the word spreads to far.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>playboy85 on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7871</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>playboy85</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7871@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>Concerning the Snap Tool Bar, it is considered Spyware, being given a risk level of 3 out of 5. Risk level 3 means the following MIGHT be true for the spyware:</p>
<p># Medium (3 Rating): these infections may cause inconvenience and may display misleading information. Typical characteristics could include:</p>
<p>    * Presenting the user with a misleading or incomplete End User License Agreement (EULA) during installation<br />
    * Displaying aggressive advertising in multiple pop-up windows<br />
    * Pretending to uninstall </p>
<p>It is considered a threat. To maintain their reputation of 100% Spyware Free, GOTD needs to make sure the software they are offering is just that, 100% free of potentially dangerous spyware. SNAP toolbar is potentially dangerous.</p>
<p>It makes one wonder if GOTD actually checks the software they are offering. If so, and they still allowed this spyware then I have to wonder about the future of GOTD. Are they so cash strapped they are going to resort to offering software with spyware just to make a few dollars?</p>
<p>Anyone can do a search for Snap Toolbar and see how dangerous this program is. It is a shame that GOTD has disregarded their own "100% spyware free" and has infected perhaps thousands of users. </p>
<p>It's your reputation GOTD. I dont mind passing the word on to others that GOTD gives out spyware like it was candy on Halloween and to avoid this place.</p>
<p>GOTD's lack of explaination on this issue tell the real story. </p>
<p>I think I will write about this issue on my blog sometime this week.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7867</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7867@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>Lets wait and see what happens.....
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hempman on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7818</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Hempman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7818@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>There is a difference between a "toolbar" like Google and stuff intentionally meant to mess with a system and/or steal private stuff. There is a difference when a "toolbar" like Dealio and SNAP are specifically seen by the AV/AntiSpyware industry as DANGEROUS.</p>
<p>We are not talking "BLAME" here, we are talking about a lack of responsibility on the part of GOTD in actually following thier own policy to NOT include SPYWARE 100%.</p>
<p>Hiding behind the nonsense that my 80 yo father could install it safely by knowing to not let them add that DANGEROUS SPYWARE to his computer is ridiculous.</p>
<p>I have to make two notes. One, despite closing another version of this very discussion, the controversy rages on, and has simply moved to a different topic.</p>
<p>Two, I note that as I write this with a mere 4 hours left on the download of today on the main site, there are only 31 comments, and a total of 167 votes. Clearly, the visitors are awaiting a cogent response from the GOTD admins.</p>
<p>How can anyone trust GOTD if they are to allow a fiasco like false advertising of the product offered, and the inclusion of known spyware in obvious violation of thier 100% SPYWARE FREE policy?</p>
<p>I predict that this will continue until GOTD either folds or corrects thier error in not speaking to this problem.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7792</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7792@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>also,<br />
eaLazerBeam,<br />
you are right that we should not blame GOTD for this<br />
I agree<br />
what we should do however, is "blame" for their "fixing" process<br />
what are the views of GOTD? what steps are they taking?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7791</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7791@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>First,<br />
I don't think of this as an argument<br />
I think of this a topic/place for people to "get" together and share ideas<br />
second,<br />
I really doubt that a lot of computers got "damage" because of this<br />
the point is that<br />
100% SAFE DOWNLOAD<br />
if it spy ware is included, it is not "safe", that is THE POINT, not that we have a CHOICE</p>
<p>if a program claimed to be 100% safe, but was not, then there is no point "arguing"
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eaLazerBeam on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7787</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>eaLazerBeam</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7787@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>Come on, people - this argument is crazy! If you didn't have the time to read the agreement and uncheck the box then it's your own fault...</p>
<p>Anyway, 100% Adware and Spyware Free generally means the software will not install any <strong>hidden adware or spyware</strong> that you can't choose not to install.</p>
<p>The point is, even if you <strong>purchase</strong> the software, the toolbar(s) will be there, so we can't blame GAOTD...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Archangel on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7786</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Archangel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7786@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>You couldn't make it any clearer ChrisW. No one expected anything else. We should go thru the installation step by step but who would have thought about the other "goodies" were included in it.</p>
<p>Read the complaints again FABScott. Try looking at it from their point of view.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ChrisW on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7775</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ChrisW</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7775@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>No, unchecking a box doesn't take any skill. And apparently being a smart-a$$ doesn't take much skill either.</p>
<p>The point has nothing to do with the checking and unchecking; it has to do with <em>knowing</em> what to uncheck. It's not like the installer says:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>I'd like to drop something on your system that has nothing to do with the software you're installing, but may slow down your system, possibly interfere with the operation of other softwareand maybe even expose your personal data to outsiders -- but we won't tell you which. So you might as well just take a wild guess at which things you need and which you don't.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Saying that it's optional doesn't help if the users don't know how to differentiate, because they don't know what the consequences might be.</p>
<p>So that gets us back to the point.</p>
<p><strong>GOTD needs to let us know if their site is safe to recommend to, say, my mother. I'm not willing to deal with the support headaches of malware, so if they can't guarantee the malware-free experience that their little green image at least implies, then I can't send people here with a clear conscience.</p>
<p>How about it, GOTD. You're entitled to run your business the way you want, but you've got to make some kind of decision. Get off the fence. You can't keep users sucked in just by being ambiguous; sooner or later it leads -- as we saw last week -- to a bigger firestorm. </strong>
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FABScott on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7774</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FABScott</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7774@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>You don't need any particularly special skills to uncheck a box!</p>
<p>Or maybe YOU do. lmao.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7715</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 16:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7715@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>lol<br />
I agree with you Archangel<br />
I'm not a "master" down loader so I would not know :)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Archangel on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7714</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Archangel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7714@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>The only software that I have seen in along time that comes with a toolbar is those that would cost you, but instead a company compensates them by allowing a toolbar to be inserted.</p>
<p>kevinyunlai, he isn't missing the point, he's telling everybody how good he is. LOL The way I take your post FABScott, your a "Master" downloader and have much experience in the "Art of Installing". rotflmao
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>alexiussg on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7710</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alexiussg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7710@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>it's just once in a blue moon that a software comes with add-ons software. i'm sure they won't do it again..
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kevinyunlai on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7709</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kevinyunlai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7709@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>FABScott, you are not getting the point<br />
most people here have anti virus, and are able to "read"<br />
the point is that it is contradicting its 100% free of spyware,virus.....<br />
what is the point if legally free software has spyware?<br />
why not just download warez?</p>
<p>There are A LOT of free sites, but some sites require you install a toolbar or program that acts like spyware, GOTD IS NOT ONE OF THEM (yet)<br />
the main difference is that one is safe and legally free, while one is free, but not safe<br />
(in case of warez, it would be not safe or legal)<br />
GOTD used to be both safe and legal, now ......<br />
I'm sure some people don't think that it is safe anymore
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FABScott on "GOTD: Please clarify policy on adware/spyware"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/1305/page/2#post-7707</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>FABScott</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7707@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>Jesus wept - you people are unbelievable!<br />
If you download almost any program these days, you get the option to also accept a toolbar or something similar.  And in any case, most of the toolbars are not really spyware in the malware sense.  [there are some that are of course]<br />
You can't blame other people if YOU accept and download something - read what you are doing.<br />
Arghhhhhhh!!!!!
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
