<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: may - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/tags/may</link>
		<description>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: may - Recent Posts</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.2</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/rss/tags/may" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Anonymous on "Microsoft  &quot;in-place&quot; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &gt; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65211</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65211@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>well he did said on it&#39;s 650GB of data that is big my 3.1 hard-disk is only 40 MB<br />
The best that users can hope for is a 1 hour and 24 minute,<br />
The medium user profile, for example, assumed 70GB of data and 20 applications; the super user profile, on the other hand, contained 650GB of data and 40 applications.</p>
<p>Clean installs, on the other hand, were much faster
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Khai on "Microsoft  &quot;in-place&quot; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &gt; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65100</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Khai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65100@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p>you&#39;ll find that article was &#39;cherry picked&#39; for the sensational aspect.</p>
<p>the 20 hours quoted was for a system with a HUGE amount of data and represented the &#39;worst&#39; case for doing that kind of upgrade... tho the journo that wrote the article did&#39;nt point that out.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anonymous on "Microsoft  &quot;in-place&quot; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &gt; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65099</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65099@https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://links.giveawayoftheday.com/pcworld.com/article%2F171897%2Fwindows_7_upgrades_block_out_a_day.html%3Floomia_ow%3Dt0%3As0%3Aa41%3Ag26%3Ar49%3Ac0.000234%3Ab27713386%3Az0">http://www.pcworld.com/article/171897/windows_7_upgrades_block_out_a_day.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a41:g26:r49:c0.000234:b27713386:z0</a>  </p>
<p>Microsoft said that some &#34;in-place&#34; upgrades from Windows Vista to the new Windows 7 may take some users more than 20 hours to complete.
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
