<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: may - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/tags/may</link>
		<description>Giveaway of the Day Forums &#187; Tag: may - Recent Posts</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/rss/tags/may" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>hotdoge3 on "Microsoft  &#34;in-place&#34; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &#62; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65211</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hotdoge3</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65211@http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;well he did said on it&#38;#39;s 650GB of data that is big my 3.1 hard-disk is only 40 MB&#60;br /&#62;
The best that users can hope for is a 1 hour and 24 minute,&#60;br /&#62;
The medium user profile, for example, assumed 70GB of data and 20 applications; the super user profile, on the other hand, contained 650GB of data and 40 applications.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Clean installs, on the other hand, were much faster
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Khai on "Microsoft  &#34;in-place&#34; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &#62; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65100</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Khai</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65100@http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;you&#38;#39;ll find that article was &#38;#39;cherry picked&#38;#39; for the sensational aspect.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;the 20 hours quoted was for a system with a HUGE amount of data and represented the &#38;#39;worst&#38;#39; case for doing that kind of upgrade... tho the journo that wrote the article did&#38;#39;nt point that out.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hotdoge3 on "Microsoft  &#34;in-place&#34; upgrades  Windows Vista to the new Windindows 7  &#62; 20 H&#039;s"</title>
			<link>http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/topic/6275#post-65099</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hotdoge3</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65099@http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.pcworld.com/article/171897/windows_7_upgrades_block_out_a_day.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a41:g26:r49:c0.000234:b27713386:z0&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.pcworld.com/article/171897/windows_7_upgrades_block_out_a_day.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a41:g26:r49:c0.000234:b27713386:z0&#60;/a&#62;  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Microsoft said that some &#38;quot;in-place&#38;quot; upgrades from Windows Vista to the new Windows 7 may take some users more than 20 hours to complete.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

